Recently by mattW
I've decided to try and work out the cost
comparisons for a Lithium pack vs a Lead pack for a set range and a set number
of years. Is Lead Acid actually cheaper or does is just seem that way up front?
This article aims to find that out
Ah Oil, we’ve had plenty of good times
together haven’t we? Remember me learning to drive… buying my first car… our
first road trip together. We’ve made some pretty good memories… you and
My concern for the environment started when earth, fire, wind, water and heart combined to fight the forces of corporate greed and irresponsibility. Yes, Captain Planet was my hero. I’ve had quite a lot of greening influences in my life, from cartoons, to a kid’s solar experimentation kit, to my friend’s parent’s weird composting toilet. I’ve developed quite an awareness of global environment issues, especially to do with energy and I think make a decent effort to change my lifestyle in order to reduce my impact on the world. But I don’t call myself an environmentalist, not in a million years. How can I care about the environment on one hand yet refuse to join the ranks of like minded individuals on the other? The reason is that calling yourself green is about as definitive as calling yourself the world’s best street fighter. Within 24 hours of making such a claim you are almost guaranteed to be in a hospital ward after being well and truly schooled by a Thai underground kick boxing champion, or in this case a vegan Greenpeace activist who lives in a solar powered mound of dirt.
Conventional cars work by exploding fuel and air in a chamber to exert force on the pistons, but what if rather than using an explosion to provide that pressure on the piston, you just stored your ‘fuel’ at a constant high pressure. That’s the concept behind the air car, and it looks like a pretty promising technology. Like hydrogen the air is not actually the source of energy, it is the storage medium, but unlike hydrogen the production of an air powered car is surprisingly cheap. According to Wikipedia, without the need for a cooling, ignition or starter system these vehicles can be produced for approximately 20% cheaper than conventional car engines. That factor should not be underestimated since up until now, greener options have always seemed to come at a premium. Unlike battery electric vehicles a full tank of air will stay more or less full for a long time, they have very low discharge rates. Again compared to battery electrics the storage medium (tank) is not limited by a shelf life or number of cycles and therefore reduces waste. As the air expands in the engine it actually cools it, which can be used for passenger comfort. The car itself has no emissions since it just uses normal air (the air might actually end up cleaner because of filtration) and the compression can be done using renewable energy to make the entire system emission free. It can even run underwater if need be! This technology is honestly quite promising, but like the other ‘green’ options will this fail to stack up when it is looked at more closely?
Hydrogen is the darling of the media, car manufacturers and oil companies
alike. The general public seems fairly convinced that hydrogen vehicles are going
to be the way of the future and a simple replacement for oil. Just about every
car manufacturer has done at least a fuel cell
concept, if not a ‘production ready
model’ or even consumer
testing. Hydrogen can be filled
up in more or less the same way as conventional cars meaning that consumers
can continue in their established transport patterns. It can be produced from a
variety of different
sources including electricity and has the potential to be created with zero
emissions. Best of all the only thing to come out of the tailpipe of a fuel
cell vehicle is water vapour.But is hydrogen really the miracle cure for
oil dependence and transport environmental damage that everyone thinks it is?
Photo from GreenCarSite


