 |
|

06-26-2012, 05:57 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central New York
Posts: 7,591
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
From CALB themselves, charge cutoff at 3.6V
http://www.calibpower.com/ProductDetails.aspx?p=2&id=3
Those of us who have been using the cells for a while can attest to the fact that there is almost no extra capacity going above 3.5V.
|

06-27-2012, 09:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 82
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomofreno
I use the minibms so cells shunt at 3.5V. Within 20 minutes the pack relaxes to less than 124V, and within a couple hours they are less than 123V. Just driving 2/10 mile and stopping they are down around 120V. I drive down about 1/2 mile long hill after that and if I keep regen currents 25 to 50A the pack V remains below 123V. Always amazes me I can run that much current into them right after full charge and less than 2Ah used and they don't go higher in voltage.
Were the high voltage warnings you've had due to regen currents? If so, do you know their magnitude? I'm using the regen limiting map to limit max regen to about 140A. That is about what I get if I remove my foot from the accelerator when traveling at 50+ mph for a quick stop - don't want to over-volt my cells if I have to emergency stop not long after full charge. Also have the user_overvoltage parameter set to 130% or 124.8V. I have exceeded it a couple times, regen cuts out, and the car accelerates down the hill.
Yes, 3.6 is the max voltage CALB recommends.
|
How things have changed. Early days of Thundersky Li Fe cells the recommended voltage was 4.25 V. We never went over 3.8. Over the next month or so, I'm going to collect some real world data and see the capacity difference between 3.5 vpc and 3.7 vpc. I know when charging the cells stay in the 3.4 to 3.5 vpc area for a long time. If they are actually fully charged at 3.5, then the amount of energy to recharge will drop significantly than going all the way to 3.7.
Answer to your question Tom: It has occasional over voltage trips right after charging when in regen. Who knows, we may find we can go 48 cells without issue, stay tuned.
Brian
|

06-27-2012, 10:10 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 190
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Hi Brian
Could you tell me what would be the max voltage (batts)
I can use on a 1238-6501 controller. Will be using lif batts
Thanks Ivan oh fix your tag line link for hpev
__________________
Ivan's Garage 1999 Electric Sonoma Pickup
http://ivanbennett.com/forum
------------------------------------------------

This is just a test! Hand wound motors.
|

06-27-2012, 10:18 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 82
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivansgarage
Hi Brian
Could you tell me what would be the max voltage (batts)
I can use on a 1238-6501 controller. Will be using lif batts
Thanks Ivan oh fix your tag line link for hpev
|
Hi Ivan,
The 6501 is rated at 84 volts nominal, I have pushed it to 96 (30 cells) with lithium. The max voltage is 105 volts.
We are looking in to the link now, can't figure out why it is being routed through DIY. I have sent DIY an email, haven't heard back yet.
Thanks,
Brian
|

06-27-2012, 11:06 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,155
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
edit your sig in "User CP" above, go to "Edit signature", highlight the " www.hpevs.com" and click on the "break link" icon, then click on the "link" Icon and retype the URL.
Hope that helps
|

06-27-2012, 11:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 82
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by frodus
edit your sig in "User CP" above, go to "Edit signature", highlight the " www.hpevs.com" and click on the "break link" icon, then click on the "link" Icon and retype the URL.
Hope that helps
|
Thanks Travis, I think that worked. If you don't mind, please test it on your end to make sure.
|

06-27-2012, 11:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 82
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomofreno
Hope 48 looks ok. The CALB spec has always been different than Thundersky. It was 3.6V three years ago when JRP3 and I bought our cells from them when they were called SkyEnergy.
The charge curve below was taken on one cell when charging the pack at 25A. Charging current started tapering off toward the end of charge, but lets be generous and say it remained at 25A the entire time. Then between 3.450 and 3.701V the cell received 25*(3100-2652)/3600 = 3.1 Ah. Probably more like 2.5 Ah considering the current dropping off.
Attachment 13359
|
Wow, that is way different than the Voltronix (Thundersky) I have in the Porsche. I'm updating the BMS this week with new software. I'm going to set it up at 3.5 volts max and see if the over voltage trip goes away.
Thanks for the info,
Brian
|

06-27-2012, 11:26 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,155
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by HPEVS
Thanks Travis, I think that worked. If you don't mind, please test it on your end to make sure.
|
Yup, works fine!
|

06-27-2012, 11:39 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central New York
Posts: 7,591
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by HPEVS
How things have changed. Early days of Thundersky Li Fe cells the recommended voltage was 4.25 V.
|
That was actually too high really, and I think the reason a lot of people killed some cells prematurely. I think it resulted from poor translations of Chinese instructions which probably said not to go over 4.25V, which people took to mean charge to 4.25V.
|

06-27-2012, 11:45 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,940
|
|
Re: Hpevs ac50
Quote:
Originally Posted by HPEVS
How things have changed. Early days of Thundersky Li Fe cells the recommended voltage was 4.25 V. We never went over 3.8. Over the next month or so, I'm going to collect some real world data and see the capacity difference between 3.5 vpc and 3.7 vpc. I know when charging the cells stay in the 3.4 to 3.5 vpc area for a long time. If they are actually fully charged at 3.5, then the amount of energy to recharge will drop significantly than going all the way to 3.7.
Answer to your question Tom: It has occasional over voltage trips right after charging when in regen. Who knows, we may find we can go 48 cells without issue, stay tuned.
Brian
|
I deleted the post on this charge curve because there seems to be an error in the time axis when imported from LogView into Excel. The values seemed to be about what I had seen in other tests so I didn't catch it right away. I'll see if I can figure it out...
Edit: collected new data and reported it here: http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...1&postcount=62
Last edited by tomofreno; 05-05-2013 at 09:53 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|