Go Back  

DIY Electric Car Forums > EV Conversions and Builds > Controllers

Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-30-2011, 01:52 PM
valerun valerun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 946
valerun is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Big Sol or not to be Big Sol?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qer View Post
Then you will end up sitting in the garage waiting for the pack voltage to drop enough so you can even start the car. You might want to buy some kind of serious dummy load so you can bleed off enough charge to get the pack voltage to drop down to close to nominal after the charger has topped off the pack.
LOL. Anyway, I have my chargers set at 3.5V CV which leaves a few % of capacity on the table but should get me quite a bit of pack life back (CALBs are rated for 3.6V CV). Within a few min of charge completion, cells drop below 3.4V. So I'm all good re 100 cells I think.

BTW adding 10 more cells to my Fiat this weekend - for 90 total. Should finally get me to 1000A beyond 3000RPM (one can hope...).
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 06-30-2011, 05:08 PM
piotrsko piotrsko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 847
piotrsko is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Big Sol or not to be Big Sol?

Quote:
Originally Posted by valerun View Post
Within a few min of charge completion, cells drop below 3.4V. So I'm all good re 100 cells I think.
It has been my experience in 40 some years of electronics test that "nominal" battery voltages are always "nominal" +/ 10%. we stopped using carbon zinc chemistry for calibration back in the '70's. take pictures of the sol smoke, please (I really don't think it will, I'll BET Tess and Qer have still more tricks up their sleeves)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-30-2011, 05:28 PM
valerun valerun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 946
valerun is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Big Sol or not to be Big Sol?

Quote:
Originally Posted by piotrsko View Post
It has been my experience in 40 some years of electronics test that "nominal" battery voltages are always "nominal" +/ 10%. we stopped using carbon zinc chemistry for calibration back in the '70's. take pictures of the sol smoke, please (I really don't think it will, I'll BET Tess and Qer have still more tricks up their sleeves)
won't smoke, I'm afraid - their components should be rated for way more than 342V limit to survive all the fun action inside ;-)) Caps are probably the closest but even then I'd expect 500V rating due to the need to absorb inductive spikes...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-01-2011, 03:56 AM
Qer's Avatar
Qer Qer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,715
Qer will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Big Sol or not to be Big Sol?

Yep, there's some margins there + that the Soliton will abort the precharge the moment the cap voltage exceeds 342 Volts.
__________________
Swedish Programming Dude for Evnetics, LLC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by toddshotrods View Post
I like the Soliton's hi-tech build and ability to deliver whopping doses of current until someone screams "Uncle!"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-01-2011, 05:08 AM
alexcrouse alexcrouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 150
alexcrouse is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Big Sol or not to be Big Sol?

Quote:
Originally Posted by valerun View Post
probably possible but:
1. 4000 amps of IGBTs (assuming 4000 amps is a combined continuous rating) will give you maybe 2000A peak. You will need to derate ~30-50% to allow for heating and then you need to derate for uneven current sharing (a LOT of derating if you use, say, 7 600A IGBTs). So in the end, you will probably have to use 10 600A IGBT modules to get reliable 2000A. Plus 10 similarly sized modules for freewheel diodes (unless, of course, you find dual IGBT modules - which are hard to come by used at that power rating).
2. Of course, at that point, you have several feet of busbars connecting things together (even more if you are using separate freewheel and switch modules). Every inch of a standalone conductor is ~20nH. at 2000A turned off in 1us, this will kick back with 40V inductive spike (assuming linear ramp-down which it ain't so likely 2x higher or so). 12 inches - with 480V, 2 feet - with 960V and so on. So proper bus designs etc are critical and even then you would probably be looking at 500V+ spikes at your desired current levels.
3. This means you *will* have a voltage limitation on your design. It will be tough to find modules with voltage ratings beyond 1200V. Also, other isolating components (Dc-DC for gate driver, isolator for drive signal, etc) can likely be taken to 1kV tops. Which gives you 500V max battery voltage input. But that's with zero margin so derate some more. Pretty soon you're at 300V pack voltage rating.
4. You can reduce the voltage stresses by slowing down your switching. Then you will need to reduce switching frequency to keep the switching losses under control. But then you will have another problem of input caps becoming too large (as they need to support the switching current). At 2000A output, 50% duty (when they work the hardest), you are looking at 2000A draw for, say, 50us (10kHz switching) and then 2000A fill for same time from battery. If you want to limit your battery current ripple to, say, 10% (or 100A in this case), you are looking at 5V max voltage ripple on caps (assuming 100 100AH CALB cells with 0.5 mOhm per cell). 5V at 2000A for 50us is 20,000uF input caps. Chances are, with components you can easily find, switching frequency has to be reduced further. At 5kHz, you will need 40,000uF, and so on. All that is in addition to your caps needing to support 2000A ripple current which is not trivial and sounds like 20-40 high-ripple smaller caps in parallel on a laminated bus to me...

Overall, according to my analysis (not really expert but after having read a LOT of stuff and taking my pseudo-controller to ~500A), it will be 'really' hard to get more than 500kW out of the controller build with reasonably accessible parts. And I might be optimistic here, too... Then again, you have a 300kW Soliton1 and 500kW WarpDrive already built for you...

If you want to go higher than that, it's into the exotic land of 1600A 1700V $1000 IGBT modules, custom film capacitors, active shaping of the switching curves, exotic snubbers, etc.

Not impossible but far from just mounting a few IGBT modules on a heatsink.

PS. Don't have any vested interest in Soliton1 (yet, anyway ;-) - just appreciating what these guys did after having tried a few of those things on my own..

V

I see a couple guys on here that only need it to last till the end of the strip.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-01-2011, 07:04 AM
Qer's Avatar
Qer Qer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,715
Qer will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Big Sol or not to be Big Sol?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexcrouse View Post
I see a couple guys on here that only need it to last till the end of the strip.
Yep. But they still have to stop the vehicle in an orderly manner. Continue to accelerate due to melted IGBTs until the strip ends and the car crashes into the terrain is not quite on the orderly scale...
__________________
Swedish Programming Dude for Evnetics, LLC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by toddshotrods View Post
I like the Soliton's hi-tech build and ability to deliver whopping doses of current until someone screams "Uncle!"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Share or Bookmark this

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2009 Green Web Publishing LLC
Ad Management by RedTyger