Go Back  

DIY Electric Car Forums > EV Conversions and Builds > Batteries and Charging

Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2012, 05:22 PM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Elcon question

In their multitude of literature about their chargers is the phrase "and tools to load new algorithms in the field."

I assume it would require a dealer or the Sacramento boys to do this "field" reprogramming? I see no information about it included.

(Sorry, I dont intend to stay lithium ignorant forever...Lol)

TYVM,Miz
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-27-2012, 06:57 PM
Coulomb's Avatar
Coulomb Coulomb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 716
Coulomb is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Elcon question

Quote:
Originally Posted by mizlplix View Post
I assume it would require a dealer or the Sacramento boys to do this "field" reprogramming? I see no information about it included.
I think that's what is intended.

However, it may be possible to use the connector at the top of the image below to JTAG program it:



You'd have to figure out what the processor is, figure out the JTAG connector pinout (if that even is a JTAG connector), reverse engineer the code, and then downloading a new image would be relatively easy.

There's a lot of assumptions in the above, and they may have put spanners in the works at various points. Personally, I'd like to see the details published (either by the manufacturer, or by an enterprising user that wants to be able to upgrade his charger without sending it half way around the world).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2012, 07:37 PM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Elcon question

Me too. I don't have a problem with the $75 charge, it is the shipping both ways that is a game killer.

I have found that most of the " dealers" I have conversed with are very evasive when answering questions about programming a charger. A few admitted that they need it to go to Sacramento and they dont do it "in house".

Leading me to believe no one outside Elcon, USA can do it.

Of coarse I've been wrong before.

Miz
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2012, 06:17 AM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Elcon question

OK, From a layman's perspective....I only see 1 actual "algorithm" with 10 steps of charging voltage to suit your cell count.

Not the "10 unique algorithms, easily field programmable with tools included to do it in the field".

It is a good charger, but it is FAR from what they puff it up to sound like.

Yet more creative salesmanship.

Miz
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2012, 09:33 AM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Elcon question

Totaly agreed. Nice charger. But mine is set up for no BMS. If I get a BMS later it will cost me $75 plus post both ways. Oh well I can dream.

Miz
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2012, 09:47 AM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Elcon question

Not so much to control the charger. Elcon told me it was a totally different more aggressive charge curve with BMS than one without....like mine. If mine were used with a BMS then my pack would be woefully under charged and it charges much slower too.

Miz
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2012, 10:01 AM
dladd dladd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Novato, California
Posts: 609
dladd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Elcon question

Quote:
Originally Posted by mizlplix View Post
Not so much to control the charger. Elcon told me it was a totally different more aggressive charge curve with BMS than one without....like mine. If mine were used with a BMS then my pack would be woefully under charged and it charges much slower too.

Miz
why is that? what does a BMS have to do with the charging curve?
__________________
1995 Saturn SL2 ev conversion
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2012, 10:24 AM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Elcon question

Their explain was you needed to be more careful without BMS.

I am a noob at this. Time will reveal the truth to me.

Miz
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2012, 11:29 AM
dladd dladd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Novato, California
Posts: 609
dladd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Elcon question

but even with a BMS I'm still not going to be charging any higher. I currently charge to 3.5v/cell. This is where I would charge whether I have a BMS or not. I still don't get why I'd want a different algorithm with/without a BMS.

Maybe they consider 3.5vpc woefully undercharged? Do they recommend charging to a higher voltage? My cycle tests (with a PL-6 battery station) show me that there is pretty much nothing above 3.5v

The way Miz worded it, it sounds to me like Elcon is saying if you take a charger that is designed to be used without a BMS, then put on a BMS, the same charger with the same algorithm will now suddenly undercharge the pack. That doesn't make sense.
__________________
1995 Saturn SL2 ev conversion
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-02-2012, 06:07 PM
mizlplix's Avatar
mizlplix mizlplix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The great American South/West desert.
Posts: 1,315
Blog Entries: 4
mizlplix will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Elcon question

Why do they ask if you are using BMS or not when doing your charger order work sheet?

I think it has to do with which system you use to cut off the charger. Mine came with the remote control circuit soldered togather, and stated to "remove solder dot to connect to a BMS system (which then controls the shut off point).

They also said curve 611 was only compatible with a BMS. and gave me a 501 curve.

To add to my confusion, I have a 120 volt pack, I assumed it needed a model 120 charger. I got a model 96 charger. It still covers the range, but only just.

Cool, Thanks, guys.

Miz

Last edited by mizlplix; 04-02-2012 at 06:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Share or Bookmark this

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2009 Green Web Publishing LLC
Ad Management by RedTyger