Truck de-ICE'd. The flathead 6 and transmission were over 600 lbs.
Leaf early stage dissection.
Leaf early stage dissection.
Damned shame to get rid of that I-beam front axle...
Probably as much work to IFS the rear as it would be the front.
Is this your Fargo car that has changed its color? I am waiting for the new changes on your Nissan Leaf. I'm also working on a project for my 2015 Honda CRV, the rear end and tire were also dented after an accident. I look forward to learning from your experiences here, For the selection of new tires for my CRV, I read several articles as at Best Tires for Honda CRV of 2022: What are the Options? - Tireer and shortened the selection to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Vredestein Quatrac Pro. Need some helpful advice and I'll take a few pictures of it's condition.These old Dodge/Fargo trucks handle nicely for their age but the suspension and stopping is not suited to modern highways. So I'd be modifying the front regardless. I did go back and forth on this, though.
With the "butterfly" hood, I was thinking of a frunk, and might still put in a small compartment on one side of it.
View attachment 128171
Not my picture, just taken from the internet to show the hood.Is this your Fargo car that has changed its color? I am waiting for the new changes on your Nissan Leaf. I'm also working on a project for my 2015 Honda CRV, the rear end was also dented after an accident. I look forward to learning from your experiences here. I'll take a few pictures of it's condition.
Looks like a worthwhile conversion that will makes good use of valuable and scarce resources! I'm on board with this one.Daily driver, dump runner, furniture getter. It'll get spruced up but worked, not a show pony. The CHAdeMO connector will be transferred in case I find a two way EVSE that actually exists and isn't wildly overpriced.
147 HP, 40 kWh.Looks like a worthwhile conversion that will makes good use of valuable and scarce resources! I'm on board with this one.
What motor HP and battery size did you get with the donor Leaf? How do the tracks and WBes compare?
I hadn't considered beefing up and using the Leaf frame. Keeping the battery pack more central to the vehicle and low to the ground certainly appeals to me. Rear suspension would indeed need some attention.I wonder if the cab and bed, with these two main dimensions(track and WB) being so close, could be dropped onto the cut-away and reinforced unibody. If so, most of the battery and suspension mounting points could be maintained for alignment and ease of assembly. This is a earlier model (your model is probably close to this) with the sheet metal and B and C pillars cut away(the second picture with the frame structure in red): A new platform developed exclusively for EVs.
The cross member/ fire wall between the A pillars would probably have to be removed for cab clearance and replaced by a lower mounted cross member. AIR the rocker panels/ sills on the Leaf have a large cross section(for battery protection?). There is a lot of room for rectangular tubing to be slid inside for reinforcement. The frame horns supporting the front and rear suspension could also be reinforced for your application. There may not be enough clearance around the back end of the battery for a leaf spring based rear suspension.
I think that it would probably be easier to build a custom frame, designed to work with the Leaf front subframe and battery pack, and using some suitable suspension (possibly the Leaf, but hopefully something better).I wonder if the cab and bed, with these two main dimensions(track and WB) being so close, could be dropped onto the cut-away and reinforced unibody.
I agree: the front mounts of leaf springs of a good length would need to be ahead of the rear of the battery case, and wouldn't be spaced widely enough to run up each side of the battery.There may not be enough clearance around the back end of the battery for a leaf spring based rear suspension.
To be sure, the red "frame" in the picture is an integral part of the unibody structure attached to sheet metal and other structures along one, two, or more of its cross sectional corners. It would be a lot of plasma and/or cutoff wheel work to get to the red frame state. If you were careful with your cutting, maybe added some temporary bracing, you could keep it as a roller( a drive-able roller?) This would make it a lot easier to move around and store out of the way. It would probably be good to keep the floor and battery in place for extra stiffness as the cutting and reinforcing of the frame structure is sorted out.I hadn't considered beefing up and using the Leaf frame. Keeping the battery pack more central to the vehicle and low to the ground certainly appeals to me. Rear suspension would indeed need some attention.
It's a 1/2 ton. The curb weight on the Leaf is about the same as the Fargo (3500 lbs-ish), but I'm using the heavy parts of the Leaf so I expect the final weight to creep up a bit. I know the 62 kWh Leafs (Leaves?) have stiffer springs for the back but I'm not sure if they're any different up front.To be sure, the red "frame" in the picture is an integral part of the unibody structure attached to sheet metal and other structures along one, two, or more of its cross sectional corners. It would be a lot of plasma and/or cutoff wheel work to get to the red frame state. If you were careful with your cutting, maybe added some temporary bracing, you could keep it as a roller( a drive-able roller?) This would make it a lot easier to move around and store out of the way. It would probably be good to keep the floor and battery in place for extra stiffness as the cutting and reinforcing of the frame structure is sorted out.
If this type of conversion works out, think of all of the dozens of brackets and mounts all ready in place in the front end of the vehicle for the suspension, power train, cooling, heating, electronic, and other systems. This could save on a lot of work.
Is this a 1/2 or 3/4 ton truck? As brian alludes to, there may not be enough weight capacity in the Leaf stock front suspension for your needs.