DIY Electric Car Forums banner

1962 Mercury Comet + 2013 Nissan Leaf

5121 Views 60 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  olegil
5
I already made a post in the new members introduction section that highlights my previous builds, including an EV classic motorcycle. In that thread I shared that I bought a wrecked 2013 Nissan Leaf.



Wrecked Leafs like this don't come up for sale very often in my area (Kansas, US) so I bought it. The good: it was made in late 2013 so it has the upgrades over the first gen Leafs, and it has the 6kw charger. The bad: it only has the 24kwh battery and it's a 78% health, which means its really a 18kwh battery pack. And the front sub frame is mangled.

I'll buy a Resolve-EV controller as soon as they're in stock again. I've been waiting patiently all month but the website still says "More stock by end of February".

Then I started hunting for a car to put the Leaf parts into. I'm a fan of classic cars, and station wagons in particular. My brain was telling me to use a retro Mercedes 300TD wagon because the chassis and bodies are well contructed, safe, etc. But my heart was telling me to get something more classic, like a wagon version of a Chevy Nova or Plymouth Fury or Ford Fairlane.

Well I couldn't decide, so I bought both!



The yellow wagon is a 1980 Mercedes 300TD. It's running and driving pretty good although needs a little work, but it just completed a drive from Los Angeles to Kansas City so it the engine is strong. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with in the long run, I think I'll keep it for a backup EV conversion candidate.

But here's what I'm really excited about.


This is what I'll be converting. It's a 1962 Mercury Comet. Identical in many ways to a Ford Falcon. It's in great condition, it does have a small, running engine and a three-on-the-tree transmission, but there's no driveshaft currently. I'll need to upgrade the brakes, add seatbelts, give it a paintjob, repair the roof (it's caved in a little), and do a little interior work.

This is a perfect restoration candidate. Ugly but in great condition. All the glass is there and not cracked, including the wrap around rear windows which would be impossible to find I think. All the chrome trim is there and just needs to be polished. The chrome bumpers are perfectly straight. Most of the body is really straight and dent free, only the roof needs repair. And there is not a lot of rust, most of it can be sanded off or treated with POR15.
Vehicle Car Steering part Motor vehicle Fixture

It was last registered in 1975! Lived in California its entire life.

BTW you might be tempted to think that this is a super heavy American gargantu-wagon. But it is a small car, made to compete against the VW Beetle and the Chevy Corvair. The sedan version only weighs 2,600 pounds! I'll try to get this wagon version weighed but it could be around 2,800 pounds.

I want to get it running as-is (with the ICE engine) just to see how it performs, and get it registered. Maybe dress it up like a mini Ghostbusters ectomobile. And then this summer I can start the EV conversion.

Here's the Comet's ICE engine.

Hood Motor vehicle Wood Automotive tire Gas


170ci (2.8L) inline-six. New carb, new fuel pump, new starter, new exhaust manifold, new battery, new alternator (generator?). I had to add a manual choke cable and replace the starter solenoid, and now it runs pretty well. But I think the clutch is stuck and I can't really get the transmission out of neutral I don't think. There's no driveshaft because the the previous owner tried to install an OD unit to the output of the transmission, and it's all hodge-podged together.

I need to decide how I'm going to convert it to EV. At this point, I have a lot of options. [Update, I'm not doing any of these options lol]
  • traditional EV conversion: mount the Leaf motor to the old manual transmission via a coupler and adapter plate. Put the batteries behind the rear seat and add a leaf to the leaf spring pack to handle the extra weight.
    • I can buy the adapter plate but it would be really expensive, or I can make my own using SendCutSend but there's the possibility of errors
    • for the coupler, I really don't understand the concept. Why do some people use carrier bearings?
    • If the trans I have now is no good (possible) then I'll need to find another one.
    • and I would still need to upgrade the brakes and handling ($1000 to $2000).
  • Building/modifying an independent rear suspension (IRS) and mounting the Leaf motor+gearbox to it, with custom CV shafts to the rear wheels. Fill the engine bay with batteries.
    • might save a lot of money and weight, and might not be more work then making adapter plates and couplers
    • the Comet is pretty small, same size as a Falcon or Mustang, so not a lot will fit. Certainly not a Crown Vic subframe.
    • might be able to use a Miata rear subframe, it's the right width, but the Leaf motor may not fit in there, and the Miata suspension will need to be upgraded for the extra weight
      • I could also swap in the front Miata subframe while I'm at it, and get brake and steering upgrades.
    • might be able to use a Benz w123 rear subframe, but will need to modify it to be 2" more narrow and also will have to run the Leaf motor+gearbox in reverse!
      • Someone did this with a w123 subframe and a Tesla motor. I've also seen a tesla subframe get narrowed. So it might be possible.
      • This was my plan when I thought I was going to convert the Mercedes 300TD. And I love how the suspension feels on that vehicle.
      • Running the Leaf motor+gearbox in reverse is possible but if the bearings are unsealed then not advisable.
    • wheel bolt pattern could be an issue
  • convert the Comet to FWD. Similar to the previous idea but will need to find a FWD sub frame.
    • might be able to use a subframe from a Ford Focus or something, but modified to be a few inches narrower.
    • The Leaf's front subframe is too wide, and the one I have is too banged up after the wreck. Could be straightened maybe, IDK.
    • This honestly seems like a better idea than putting the motor in the rear, will be easier to fit.
  • Mount the Leaf motor+gearbox at 90°, such that one CV shaft attaches the the driveshaft, and fix the other CV shaft so that it can't spin. No, wait, this won't work because the rear axle adds more gear reduction.
My goals are to have a daily driver classic car that is also EV, and big enough for the whole family. After the conversion, I'll probably want to upgrade to a 40kwh battery pack if I can find one. Speed is not something that really excites me like it does some people, but if I can do a burnout then that would be cool I guess.

This project is probably going to take a few years. Wish me luck!
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 20 of 61 Posts
  • convert the Comet to FWD. Similar to the previous idea but will need to find a FWD sub frame.
That Focus subframe is really just one crossmember, with the struts and the front of the powertrain mounted directly to the unibody. You can use this sort of setup, but there would be substantial structural fabrication involved. Most cars don't have a subframe as extensive as the one in the Leaf (which still doesn't include the strut mounts).
  • Helpful
Reactions: 1
Here's the Comet's ICE engine.

View attachment 135737

170ci (2.8L) inline-six.
The best thing about that engine, from an EV conversion standpoint, is that while you describe it as "small" it is a cast-iron lump weighing close to 400 pounds... so removing it (and the transmission) will allow for a reasonable amount of battery without excessively increasing the total vehicle weight in the conversion.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
While the W123 is a famously good vehicle, and the independent rear suspension was a premium feature for the time, by modern standards the semi-trailing arm design of the rear suspension is very basic... and as you have realized it is not suitable for drive units with the motor ahead of the axle line. As with other similar suspensions (such as in BMWs), the final drive case (differential housing) forms part of the subframe, so when converting to EV you need to put loads through the drive unit case or provide alternative structure.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
One more point and one of the main reasons I started looking at fitting the drive unit to a IRS in the rear: this would allow me to put all the battery cells under the hood. And for weight distribution, that would be much more desirable than putting the battery pack behind the rear axle.

An even more radical idea would be to use a front subframe and use it for the rear! That's what this guy is doing, putting a prius engine and subframe into the back of a Chevy Corvair.

That Focus subframe is really just one crossmember, with the struts and the front of the powertrain mounted directly to the unibody. You can use this sort of setup, but there would be substantial structural fabrication involved. Most cars don't have a subframe as extensive as the one in the Leaf (which still doesn't include the strut mounts).
Yeah, I would need to modify and beef up the structure for sure. I don't mind doing that and I'm not daunted by it, but a negative would be that it would be a lot harder to return the car back to original condition, if that is something I would want to do a long time from now.

And I was just spitballing when threw out the name Ford Focus, it just looked like a simple and easy crossmember to modify, and cheap/easy to aquire. I haven't investigated too many others out there and every time I do I think I found a better one. Maybe I should look again at the Leaf since I already have most of the parts. The bolt pattern is the same for the old Mercury/Ford wheels, and the Leaf has huge double-piston brake calipers.

Just section it down the middle to get the right width, can't be that hard right? Obviously weld it back together extremely well, with "fish plates" and all that.

While the W123 is a famously good vehicle, and the independent rear suspension was a premium feature for the time, by modern standards the semi-trailing arm design of the rear suspension is very basic... and as you have realized it is not suitable for drive units with the motor ahead of the axle line. As with other similar suspensions (such as in BMWs), the final drive case (differential housing) forms part of the subframe, so when converting to EV you need to put loads through the drive unit case or provide alternative structure.
That's exactly right, and thats how the guy who put a tesla drive unit into a w123 did it. He added an attachment point for the center of the crossmember, and he had to notch out the MB crossmember just a little to fit the tesla drive unit in front of it.

And I'll admit that I'm not really an expert or anything when it comes to suspension geometry. I know the basic types (solid axle, 4-link, whishbone, macpherson, etc) but that's about it.
See less See more
The Falcon (which was my first hotrod build before I could legally drive) and Comet were the same platform.

Along came the Mustang (and, later...Cougar), which had a lengthened hood, but was still basically the same platform. They even had that same engine and the 4-lug wheel bolt pattern.

I suggest looking at early Mustang EV conversions for ideas. Same basic car, same pieces....even the V8 'stang stuff could usually be retrofitted back to Falcon/Comet.
  • Like
  • Helpful
Reactions: 2
Inductive auto put a 1st gen leaf motor in an EV RX8 rear subframe (pics at bottom). From what I understand, that is interchangable with a NC miata subframe.
3
That's really helpful to see, thank you! I wish they had more photo though. But from what I see, they had no problems with enough room. But I would be working with the older style subframes and my mileage may very. Also interesting how they used the old-style Leaf inverter and mounted it upside down.





I'm getting closer to deciding what I want to do. I think about it a lot and everyday I change my mind, lol. I want to keep it a classic, but I want to be smart about it too.

I don't want to make the same mistake I made last time, when I put a VW body shell onto an entire Miata "chassis" and in the end I wasn't driving a VW Squareback, I was driving a Miata. That wasn't what I really wanted. But on the other hand, I was using the Miata dashboard, steering wheel, seats, engine, etc. So of course if felt like driving a Miata. The suspension wasn't the problem, the suspension was great!

I might be able to avoid welding to the original framerails by doing something like this:



This is a first-gen Mustang that somebody adapted a Jaguar IRS to. He made auxiliary frame railes that bolt to the leaf spring attachment points, then the crossmember attaches to the new framerails. And then the Juaguar IRS attaches to the crossmember.

While I still had a Miata in my driveway, I took these measurements of the rear subframe:
  • frame rails are 33” wide (comet’s is 40” wide)
    • where the subframe bolts too
    • sitting 19” off the ground with 23.5" size tires
  • front-to-back distance of frame bolts: 15"
  • distance between strut mounts: 39"
    • so this could either clash with the Comet frame rails, or work out perfectly in my favor because the spring perches could be welded to the Comet frame rails
  • distance from ground to strut mounts: 22”
  • loaded shock/strut height: 14”
  • approximate distance between LCA bushings: 17"
    • this is where there could be a problem fitting the Leaf motor
  • overall width from tire to tire: 63" (Comet is 61")
    • mind you that is with high offset rims on the Miata and "normal" offset rims on the Comet. So that sucks. And the Miata has a 4x100 bolt pattern which is also not ideal.
Obviously getting the correct ride height could be tricky. And to account for the difference in weight (800 to 1000 pounds?) I can do what the v8 miata guys do: use the Monster Miata springs in the front, and put the front springs in the rear. I have no idea though what that would feel like. Ironically my goal isn't to have Miata-like handling, I would actually prefer a softer, comfy ride.
See less See more
4
I think about it a lot and everyday I change my mind, lol.
Well I've already changed my mind. I woke up this morning feeling encouraged and ready to buy a Miata parts car for the subframe parts.

But I would need a NA or NB miata, because they're slightly more narrow, and not a newer miata very similar to the RX8 like the orange subframe in the above post. Well I did some very crude... rendering?... and as I suspected, the Leaf motor will not fit between the lower control arm pivot points.

[Note: this is NOT an accurate drawing]
Brown Rectangle Textile Wood Schematic

I think there's about 17" of space, even after cutting off the tabs for the braces, and I'm measuring my Leaf motor to be 18" wide. (You needed to draw a rendering to see that a 18" object could not fit into a 17" space? Yes, apparently I did.)

But that's ok! Because I found this thread, yes it appears I'm not the only one thinking that there must be a better way to put a Leaf motor+gearbox into a solid-axle RWD car. Rear subframe conversion ruminations

Well this has just opened up a whole new world for me.

First up, a 90's 240sx or 300zx subframe might be a better choice. It would be too wide for me but look how roomy it is, I bet I could chop it to the width I need and still fit the leaf motor. And the Nissan bolt pattern is just what I need too.

HOWEVER! There might be an even better idea!

The fine folks of the internet, this forum included, has informed of the concept of the De Dion Tube. Basically its like a live axle but with CV axles on the outside instead of the inside. This is what Ford used for the 2000 Ranger EV.

Here's an example from "some crazy guy in Australia" reportandly [edit: no, its actually from an EV West engineer here in the states].


I'm going to need a lot more information and to see the hubs, but this could be just perfect.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I might be able to avoid welding to the original framerails by doing something like this:



This is a first-gen Mustang that somebody adapted a Jaguar IRS to. He made auxiliary frame railes that bolt to the leaf spring attachment points, then the crossmember attaches to the new framerails. And then the Juaguar IRS attaches to the crossmember.
Nicely done :)(y) although the choice to use shackles rather than rigid brackets at the rear is interesting.
The auxiliary frame rails plus crossmember are a subframe, custom made and designed for the Mustang body and Jaguar IRS combination.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The fine folks of the internet, this forum included, has informed of the concept of the De Dion Tube. Basically its like a live axle but with CV axles on the outside instead of the inside. This is what Ford used for the 2000 Ranger EV.

Here's an example from "some crazy guy in Australia".


I'm going to need a lot more information but this could be just perfect.
Both the crazy Australian setup and the Ranger have leaf springs, which is actually uncommon for a deDion but is a reasonable choice for a vehicle that started with leaf springs and a live beam axle.
Well I did some very crude... rendering?... and as I suspected, the Leaf motor will not fit between the lower control arm pivot points.
View attachment 135823
While the overall width may be correct, the Leaf drive unit (motor plus transaxle) is not symmetric like that - the motor is on one side (right side in the original installation) with the final drive on the other side. That can be important to inboard CV joint locations and axle lengths.
I found the video that explains everything I need to know for the De Dion axle. Looks like it was made from a EV West engineer.

So I will probably just copy this the best I can. But there's a lot of time between now and when I actually get started on this, so I'll probably change my mind at least 10 times by then.

brian_ said:
Nicely done :)(y) although the choice to use shackles rather than rigid brackets at the rear is interesting.
The auxiliary frame rails plus crossmember are a subframe, custom made and designed for the Mustang body and Jaguar IRS combination.
I know, right !?

While the overall width may be correct, the Leaf drive unit (motor plus transaxle) is not symmetric like that - the motor is on one side (right side in the original installation) with the final drive on the other side. That can be important to inboard CV joint locations and axle lengths.
Good to point out. I wasn't really keeping track of that dimension because it didn't seem to matter to me in this case.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Good to point out. I wasn't really keeping track of that dimension because it didn't seem to matter to me in this case.
Meaning you will not use the Leaf hubs and axles? You have an axle guy?

Also, keep us updated. Weigh the stuff you take off the car if possible, things like that are interesting to know.
3
I'm still figuring it all out but at this point, yes I plan on using the Leaf hubs and axles, but the axles will need to be shortened. On the Leaf, the distance from hub surface to hub surface is 7" longer than on the Comet.

Here's another De Dion tube inspiration photo:
Motor vehicle Automotive tire Hood Automotive design Bumper


Here's a Volvo 360 de dion tube:
Wood Snake Metal Tail Terrestrial animal


Here's an interesting idea (I have plenty of those, not all of them are good) - use the rear twist beam axle off the Leaf. Chop it to the rite width. I'll have to measure but the front hubs may fit perfectly in those holes on the hub mounting surface.


Just looking at it, it would give a lowering effect to the Comet if I use the Leaf Springs. Or I could attempt to use the Leaf's coil springs with some custom locating links, but that feels like much more of a guessing game as for what spring rate I would need and what to do about shock absorbers. A little more engineering involved. But maybe!

=====================

As for what I have ACTUALLY done for this project other than day dream about suspension setups...

Nothing. No work at all. I haven't even started taking parts off the Nissan. The only work I've done is actually in the wrong direction, lol, I've been working on getting the ICE engine running. I just needed to add a new starter solenoid and add a choke cable, now it runs well I think, and I've started monkeying with the driveshaft and radiator. Going to try to back it out of the driveway by next weekend, hopefully the clutch and transmission work and I don't drive through the garage wall.
See less See more
You don't have to shorten the axles - just push the drive unit backwards from where you thought was its mounting point.

Sum of the squares, hypotenuse, stuff 🤓
Your Leaf front subframe is munted - But I would suggest looking for another one rather than trying to fit a Miata subframe - either in the front or in the back

Using a Leaf subframe makes all of the Leaf bits like motor and driveshafts fit easily
On the Leaf, the distance from hub surface to hub surface is 7" longer than on the Comet.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but the difference in track width is not 7 inches. So you're not measuring the same thing. You'll need to take into account the rim offset as well.

You don't have to shorten the axles - just push the drive unit backwards from where you thought was its mounting point.

Sum of the squares, hypotenuse, stuff 🤓
Unfortunately, he would have to push it REALLY far to make a difference. To make up for the difference between a 29 inch axle and a 30 inch axle, he has to offset 8 inches. If the axle is just 20 inches and he needs to make up for an additional 3 inches, that's 11.4 inches of offset to the rear. That can't be good.
Why can't it be good? It's 30 degrees for the 20 inch example and both axle stub and diff stubs are totally parallel.

The beauty is the Dedion member may wind up being a straight tube...
Why can't it be good? It's 30 degrees for the 20 inch example and both axle stub and diff stubs are totally parallel.

The beauty is the Dedion member may wind up being a straight tube...
We'll just agree to disagree on 30 degrees being a healthy angle for a CV joint. You gotta remember this is when loaded just right as well. Light or heavy in the back, there's a vertical component to the angle in addition.
1 - 20 of 61 Posts
Top