DIY Electric Car Forums banner

1976 Fiat Spider 124 EV Conversion

8981 Views 77 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  Wayne Alexander
Donner Car: 1976 Fiat Spider 124. Objective: Get my feet wet in the EV world and give me something to occupy some of my time in retirement. Challenges: Limited space, one spot in a three car garage in new house covered by a strict HOA. Advantages: Significant experience with large DIY projects. Built two vacation homes, built and flown experimental aircraft, car restoration, motorhome conversion and many other electrical mechanical systems. Background: Retire Lockheed System Engineer with AS and BS EE degrees. Age: 73. Location: Windsor Colorado

I want to build a low cost EV that is simple and performs similar to that of the 124 with the ICE. Range about 30 miles and used on relatively flat city streets with occasionally highway driving. Present design is 48 VDC Series Shunt Forklift motor of about 15 HP through the original 5 speed transmission and driven from a PWM controller from a 72 VDC LiFePo4 battery pack. No drive hardware obtained yet, still open to different technology. I intend to include significant instrumentation to monitor and document performance.

Additional information in "New Member" thread.

I intend to update this thread as I progress along with the project. Provide details on the design and lessons learned. I encourage input from the forum especially on simpler low cost approaches.

View attachment 133420
Striped down waiting for initial drive train.
41 - 60 of 78 Posts
the input shaft is very well supported by a bearing right beside the only gear on the shaft...
Yes, one end of the input shaft is well supported by probably a regular single row ball bearing. But, one regular single row ball bearing does not a well supported shaft make. It takes at least two bearings to support a shaft. Inside the transmission, only one bearing supports the shaft (ignoring the needle bearing inside the end of the input shaft- that provides end support and alignment for the transmission main shaft, ironically from a well supported input shaft) . So, this type of input shaft is NOT well supported inside the transmission. It needs to have a well located (aligned) pilot bearing, bushing, or machined hole to support the other end of the shaft.

Some transmissions have a well supported input shafts by two or more bearings inside the transmission. Some of these still use pilot bearings, others do not.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Yes, one end of the input shaft is well supported by probably a regular single row ball bearing. But, one regular single row ball bearing does not a well supported shaft make. It takes at least two bearings to support a shaft. Inside the transmission, only one bearing supports the shaft (ignoring the needle bearing inside the end of the input shaft- that provides end support and alignment for the transmission main shaft, ironically from a well supported input shaft) . So, this type of input shaft is NOT well supported inside the transmission. It needs to have a well located (aligned) pilot bearing, bushing, or machined hole to support the other end of the shaft.
All absolutely true. (y)

Some transmissions have a well supported input shafts by two or more bearings inside the transmission. Some of these still use pilot bearings, others do not.
Again, true. These are typically transversely mounted all-indirect transmissions, as commonly found in front wheel drive and some mid-engine vehicles... and EVs with motors that can be removed from the transaxle (such as the Nissan Leaf).
2
Well it moves with the small motor and three old batteries. Got about 10 mph on 25 amps at 36 volts in first. Overheated the small motor in second. Small motor only a 5" dia 24V winch motor. Its a glorified golf cart with a very kluged up system. Now to take into consideration all the forum suggestions and do the real engineering and build. Got to get a bigger motor, better coupling between motor and transmission, do away with the throttle and clutch pedals and mount the electric pedal. Figure out the battery type and how they will be mounted. Then paint and put the normal car electrical back in. This is a real DIY project, only $2400 in so far including the donor car. Now the big bucks.
Wheel Automotive parking light Car Tire Land vehicle

Hood Motor vehicle Automotive exterior Vehicle Gas
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
6
Wood Gas Tool Machine Workbench
Automotive tire Gas Engineering Circuit component Automotive wheel system


Engineering Gas Machine Auto part Automotive tire
Electrical wiring Wood Gas Engineering Machine
Electrical wiring Gas Engineering Toolroom Machine

Bought a ME1003 DC PM motor from Electricmotorsport. 12-72 volts, 15 hp continuous, 26 hp peak. Measured stall torque and got a slope of 0.8 ft lbs /amp. Based on the weight of the Spider the motor should give the Spider good performance. Surprisingly, under no load the motor start rotating at only.5 amp. The advantage of a PM motor, no field to excite. Initially using the Lovejoy coupling. Ridged coupling is having the female spline welded on. Alignment of the inline and radial dimensions accomplished with the transmission vertical. When aligned the coupling moves up and down on the trans/motor shaft with very little resistance. Than bolts torqued down and freedom of coupling checked again. With transmission horizontal, no noise or vibration, no load at 1000 rpm. Initially will use a 36v 275 amp controller I have with three 12v deep cycle batteries. Just want to get the Spider moving so I can start the EV registration process. Not worried about range yet. Initial rough estimate is that I will get 1 mile on about 800 watt hour, level 60 mph, worst case. This is based on static rolling resistance and expected wind resistance. Expect dynamic conditions to be much better. So far only measuring controller current and voltage, amp and watt hours used, and motor RPM and temperature. Working on speed, vehicle tilt angel and acceleration. Need to investigate possibility of regeneration from the DC PM motor. Into the project $3400.

Attachments

See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I must admit to thinking that its a real shame that such a nice car now has such a puny motor
Are you referring to HP or torque? Check out the 1976 Fiat torque and HP curves. Not so good at low end for the torque or high end with the HP. Torque is acceleration, HP is speed. I am not building a high speed sport car just a EV car for around town. Older Fiats may look nice but as an ICE they are a bitch to maintain. What do you consider a not puny DC Motor?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
You need to be careful about staring at ICE torque curves for comparison purposes. There's a huge torque multiplication that can occur during clutch slipping.

A skilled driver can get as much standstill torque to the tires out of a manual transmission ICE as a librarian can get by flooring an EV.
Are you referring to HP or torque? Check out the 1976 Fiat torque and HP curves. Not so good at low end for the torque or high end with the HP. Torque is acceleration, HP is speed. I am not building a high speed sport car just a EV car for around town. Older Fiats may look nice but as an ICE they are a bitch to maintain. What do you consider a not puny DC Motor?
I would consider a DC forklift motor as "not puny" - a 9 inch motor will give oodles more torque and power
I like the Fiat sports car - I used to have a Lancia Zagota - great car

But if its an EV then it should GO like an EV - not like a Golf Kart

It just seems a shame when the IC engine guys are talking about power not to be able to blow them away
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Are you referring to HP or torque? Check out the 1976 Fiat torque and HP curves. Not so good at low end for the torque or high end with the HP.
The point of a transmission is to allow the engine (or electric motor) to turn at the desired speed. After the first second or so of acceleration, suitable shifting will always have the Spider's engine able to put far more power than the peak power of that electric motor.

Yes, engine torque is low at low speed - although available torque output of the 1756 cc Fiat engine is higher than the ME1003's continuous maximum of 315 inch-pounds (26 lb-ft) at any engine speed from idle to redline - but for extreme performance the simple solution is just slipping the clutch. The torque output from the clutch is the same as the input (a clutch doesn't multiply torque but it also doesn't lose any), but it allows the engine to turn fast enough to produce more torque; ideally the driver slips the clutch just enough to allow the engine to run at its torque peak. After a second or so of slipping the car is moving fast enough that slipping isn't needed any more. The lower the performance expectation, the less slipping is used... down to a small fraction of a second in normal driving. With peak torque available down to zero speed, an electric motor doesn't need a clutch at all.

Torque is acceleration, HP is speed.
While that is often stated, it's nonsense. Torque at the engine or motor doesn't matter; torque at the wheels is what matters but that torque multiplied by wheel speed is power.
See less See more
I like the Fiat sports car - I used to have a Lancia Zagota - great car
Ironically, the only part or design feature in common between the Fiat 124 Sport Spider and the Lancia Beta Spider (called the Lancia Zagato in the U.S.) is the Fiat TwinCam engine that this conversion eliminates.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I have a 1967 TR-4A which I have had since 1969. All stock and in very good condition. I have rebuilt it many times and it is fully restored. I have never raced it but been to many meets and rallies. That is where I get my "show off kicks". The TR-4 is my baby. Do not intend to race with the Spider, show its performance off, however maybe participate in fun rallies if I get extended range.

As long as the Spider is safe to drive around town, lends it self to range extension in the future and looks reasonably good I will be happy. It is providing me the platform for experimentation, learning and keeping me busy. I am also trying to keep all cost down and do all the engineering my self. Got to do that in retirement to keep healthy.

Thanks for the comments.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
If you use AC induction/asynchronous motor, you can consider using our controller.
Font Auto part Brand Fashion accessory Rectangle
See less See more
You have built a DIY EV in a couple of months for less than most people spend on a single component of their build. You have nothing to explain. This project is awesome. Gotta start somewhere. Looking forward to seeing how it evolves.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Do not intend to race with the Spider, show its performance off, however maybe participate in fun rallies if I get extended range.

As long as the Spider is safe to drive around town, lends it self to range extension in the future and looks reasonably good I will be happy....
Fine, as long as you understand that the currently selected motor is unlikely to provide even moderately acceptable performance for normal driving around town. It's not about showing off.
Well I will find out. Its easy to put on another motor if necessary. $700 learning experience to me is worth it. When I am up and fully running on a 72 Volt I will post performance figures. May be able to get some money back on a resale of the motor if necessary. Do you think that the ME1302 would do better as recommended in a early reply?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Completed some testing with the ME1003 motor and a 36 v battery pack. Three Group 24 lead acid deep cycle batteries from my RV. Very satisfied with the performance considering the battery pack. Drove 3 miles with max speed of 22 mph and also doing acceleration tests. Used only 30 % of the battery pack. On starting in 2nd gear got max acceleration of 3 M/Sec^2 with two large guys in the car. Performance matched prediction pretty well. For reasonable driving stability added an additional 150 lbs ballast in the front to get the correct tie toe in. Weight distribution is critical when modifying from ICE to EV. Either redesign the suspension or load the car as if it had an ICE. Getting the lower weight batteries and paying the higher price may not always be the best solution. Consideration of driving conditions (Stop and Go and Hilly Terrain), type of battery care you will need to do and cost to redesign suspension needs to be considered. I am not trying to build a performance car but just one that is surface street worthy and at the lowest price possible. Next phase is to to install a 72 volt battery pack and a higher voltage/current controller. Plan to put three more batteries in the front and do away with the ballast. Need bigger cables because they got warm but the motor saw no change in temperature. However, its cold here in Colorado. Also if I want more range can add batteries in the trunk. Getting 6 new batteries and the controller will add about $1000 to the already $3500 I have into the project so far. That includes $1500 for the donor car. Then I got to paint the car, get a new windscreen, redo the normal electrics and clean up the interior and get it registered.
Car Vehicle Vehicle registration plate Hood Automotive lighting
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Keep a log to track the range and charge cycles. It'll be interesting to see the $/mile you wind up spending because of battery replacement, assuming you stay with the deep cycles.
Dollars per mile have been well documented for lead acid batteries. They have been around for many years. It is well known that dollar per mile is no where as good as that of a Li chemistry batteries. And there are a lot of other negative aspects. However, for packaging convivence, availability and to reduce initial costs I chose to go that way at this time. .
Ok.

That's irrelevant to what I asked: are you going to log those numbers from your car and post them here for others that land on the forum to understand and evaluate for their builds?
Probably not. My interest in using this vehicle with lead acid will most likely not last through a required replacement. Than I will use the lead acid batteries in a backup power supply application that does not require as many recharge cycles. I believe the number is over 3 to 1 for Li when all costs (Initial Cost, Life Span, Capacity, Safety and Disposal) are considered. Maybe you can provide the forum some insight into the number.
41 - 60 of 78 Posts
Top