Joined
·
1,021 Posts
We made it to the top of the mountain! Time was 9:55. Not bad at all considering how little time we had for testing and driver seat time!
Congratulations! About half of the Unlimited class didn't make it.We made it to the top of the mountain!
That was good for 9th place overall, and in the middle of the Unlimited class (which only had three entries that completed the run, with #1 winning overall at 9:12 and #3 over a minute behind this car).Time was 9:55. Not bad at all considering how little time we had for testing and driver seat time!
Even I have not seen it yet. But it should be available in the next day or two and I will post it here as soon as it is.Anyone have links to footage of your climb?
The entries which did not complete a valid run are listed in the linked results. There are a lot of them: presumably a few crashed, but most probably had some failure, due to the severe conditions (more sustained high power than a normal track due to the climb) or due to a lack of chance to sort out the bugs, because there is only one of this event per year and very little running time per competitor (a problem with any one-car-at-a-time event).Wow, only 78 competitors? Many who didn't finish?
The Pike's Peak climb is a little unusual in motorsports. It's not part of a series, and is not very similar to the events in any series, so it doesn't make sense for most potential competitors - especially corporations - to build a car specifically for it. As a result, it tends to get used as a demonstration event: cars are built to show the capability of a company or product, and once the point is made they move on. I think this is the case for both Palatov and Cascadia. The record-holding VW I.D. R has moved on to Nürburgring. If participation were more consistent, results would be less erratic.It's amazing that last year's competitor beat the best this year by a full 12%.
Reminds me of the 919 tribute tour last year, when the Porsche beat the Nürburgring record by 17% (normally this wouldn't be allowed, lap times are artificially limited, there are sections of the course where you could not react fast enough if something appeared).
You'd think that in these long established races, that the knife's edge would be hundreds of a second for records. It just goes to show what an exciting time we live in that things are in such flux that leaps and bounds are still being made.
Many never even started. The Motorcycles took forever to finish because of multiple accidents. Two riders were airlifted. One of them, Carlin Dunne, was killed near the finish line.Wow, only 78 competitors? Many who didn't finish?
Yes there is some resistance between the end of the roll and the cell, but far less than between the layers of the jellyroll. Literature suggests that axial heat resistivity is 10-30 times lower than radial. Our testing has confirmed that in spite of the lower surface area, cooling occurs faster on the ends than on the sides.Great effort guys, and such a shame about the tragedies on, and off the mountain.
Travis, can you show any more detailed images of the battery packs as they came together? I've always been intrigued by the idea of cooling cylindrical cells axially because the conductivity is so much better in that plane, but there's a fair old resistance gap between the bit that's hot and the end of the cell. As someone mentioned above, it sounds like Rivian packs were used![]()
I'd love to see any images if you can share them. And yeah, I did a bunch of testing at my work on axial vs radial, and concluded they were both pretty effective depending on what the goal was. The biggest challenge with axial was coming up with a cooling plate that had zero risk of shorting the pack.Yes there is some resistance between the end of the roll and the cell, but far less than between the layers of the jellyroll. Literature suggests that axial heat resistivity is 10-30 times lower than radial. Our testing has confirmed that in spite of the lower surface area, cooling occurs faster on the ends than on the sides.
Rivian packs were not used, we at EVDrive designed and built the pack for this car.
This much accident delay is not typical, but of course that sort of thing can happen in any motorsport competition.Many never even started. The Motorcycles took forever to finish because of multiple accidents. Two riders were airlifted. One of them, Carlin Dunne, was killed near the finish line.
In discussing the differences in performance between years in this sort of event, I should have mentioned weather. Some teams would presumably not have rain tires, and not run in wet conditions even aside from visibility concerns.We didn't start the cars til around noon and our car was the last one up without rain at the starting line. It ended up pouring for the remainder of the race. Everyone was switching to rain tires, and those with no windscreens decided not to run, and quite a few others decided it wasn't safe to run.
Weather was mostly the issue. Only a couple DNF's due to mechanical. No cars had accidents that I saw.
Well, I didn't say thatAs someone mentioned above, it sounds like Rivian packs were used![]()
That's an interesting challenge, but the bus plates on the Tesla modules always looked like they should be heat transfer plates to me. Of course, they're not designed for that purpose and so are not thermally well coupled to the cells.The biggest challenge with axial was coming up with a cooling plate that had zero risk of shorting the pack.
I'm not too sure about that. I think this car still has untapped potential. They were working on it and tweaking on it even during race week, and if you look at the qualifying times vs the race, we actually passed by 8 or 9 cars just in those last couple of days. So I think it's possible it could race again (I don't have any inside information on that either way).As a result, it tends to get used as a demonstration event: cars are built to show the capability of a company or product, and once the point is made they move on. I think this is the case for both Palatov and Cascadia.
The Pike's Peak climb is a little unusual in motorsports. It's not part of a series, and is not very similar to the events in any series, so it doesn't make sense for most potential competitors - especially corporations - to build a car specifically for it. As a result, it tends to get used as a demonstration event: cars are built to show the capability of a company or product, and once the point is made they move on. I think this is the case for both Palatov and Cascadia. The record-holding VW I.D. R has moved on to Nürburgring. If participation were more consistent, results would be less erratic.
It has been a couple of strange years since the 2019 event. The Pike's Peak event did run both last year and this year, although with only 44 (2020) and 52 (2021) entrants. There was a Palatov D2 car in both years, but it was an older non-EV model. The only EVs in both years were Teslas. The 2021 winner drove the same car as he drove to the win in 2019. 2021 times can't be compared to previous years because snow and ice at the top led to the course being shortened by three miles (the top three).I'm not too sure about that. I think this car still has untapped potential. They were working on it and tweaking on it even during race week, and if you look at the qualifying times vs the race, we actually passed by 8 or 9 cars just in those last couple of days. So I think it's possible it could race again (I don't have any inside information on that either way).
But in general, for sure Dennis Palatov will be back at Pikes Peak in the future; it's kinda his thing and he goes at least every other year. And he has said publicly that he wants to continue to produce additional models of electric cars. And as long as he's doing that, you have to think that Cascadia will be involved (and hopefully us at EVDrive as well). This car just scratches the surface of what is possible with these high power components.