Jack Murray <
[email protected]>wrote:
> I think having to plug in a cord to charge is a huge PITA.
>
> But I'm one who hates to clean my swimming pool, vacuum the carpet,
> put the dishes away, or make my bed everyday.
>
> I hate going to the gas station too, a toxic waste dump experience,
> but it's only once a week, not everyday (with current batteries)
>
> My idea was not to put it on the ground, but have it integrated
> into the front bumper, and you drive UP to it, not OVER it.
> Makes sense for a parking spot, not many pull-through garages or parking
> lots I've seen..
> This would allow them to be very close together.
>
> And if anyone remembers my EV Train approach, this bumper(s) would
> also allow EVs to chain together magnetically and be charged as they travel
> the freeway in a train pulled by an EV locomotive.
> Google didn't fund that idea..

>
> Jack Murray
>
> --- On Wed, 10/6/10, Bill Dube <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Bill Dube <
[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [EVDL] Wireless charging
> > To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <
[email protected]>
> > Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 12:34 PM
> > Hard to compete with a $15 conductive
> > connector. All these nifty
> > alternative methods of charging typically cost more than
> > the actual
> > electricity the car will use in its entire lifespan.
> >
> > In the colder regions of the world, they routinely use
> > conductive
> > plugs to run block heaters. About the same amount of
> > wattage as an EV
> > needs. Works without any problems. Why invent something
> > more
> > expensive when you have something that is proven to work,
> > even in the snow.

> >
> > Bill D.
> >
> > At 01:11 PM 10/6/2010, you wrote:
> > >I didn't find what the percentage is, but the
> > "breakthrough" is
> > >to have resonant fields so its efficient. 50%
> > loss might be OK for
> > >a cell phone, but when talking about the power level to
> > a car, the
> > >wasted power would be enourmous, particularly on a big
> > scale
> > >(although might say same with cell phones if used in
> > large scale).
> > >
> > >I like the idea, Tesla was right! Again!
> > >
> > >I think a laser beam might be more efficient and
> > wireless.
> > >
> > >Jack Murray
> > >
> > >--- On Wed, 10/6/10, Roger Heuckeroth <
[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Roger Heuckeroth <
[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: [EVDL] Wireless charging
> > > > To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <
[email protected]>
> > > > Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 11:35 AM
> > > > But what is the efficiency of this
> > > > kind of inductive charger with a
> > > > 6-8" air gap?
> > > >
> > > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Rod Hower wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I thought this may be of interest,
> > > > >
> > >
> http://electronicdesign.com/article/power/Collaborators-Seek-Air-Power-For-Electric-Cars.aspx?nl=1
> > > > >
> > > > > Charging up an electrical vehicle is no feat
> > of techno
> > > > wizardry.
> > > > > Plug it in,
> > > > > wait a bit, and off you go, a no brainer at
> > best. But
> > > > how about
> > > > > charging up like
> > > > > some mobile device users do: wirelessly.
> > That would
> > > > certainly make
> > > > > things easier
> > > > > for the user..............................
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > | REPLYING: address your message to
[email protected]
> > > > only.
> > > > | Multiple-address or CCed messages may be
> > rejected.
> > > > | UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > > > | OTHER HELP: http://evdl.org/help/
> > > > | OPTIONS: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> > > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >| REPLYING: address your message to
[email protected]
> > only.
> > >| Multiple-address or CCed messages may be rejected.
> > >| UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > >| OTHER HELP: http://evdl.org/help/
> > >| OPTIONS: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > | REPLYING: address your message to
[email protected]
> > only.
> > | Multiple-address or CCed messages may be rejected.
> > | UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > | OTHER HELP: http://evdl.org/help/
> > | OPTIONS: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> | REPLYING: address your message to
[email protected] only.
> | Multiple-address or CCed messages may be rejected.
> | UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> | OTHER HELP: http://evdl.org/help/
> | OPTIONS: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20101006/e071b3e3/attachment.html
_______________________________________________
| REPLYING: address your message to
[email protected] only.
| Multiple-address or CCed messages may be rejected.
| UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
| OTHER HELP: http://evdl.org/help/
| OPTIONS: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev