Good to hear the interest. I probably won't bother geting more data for now on the HM29's as I'd rather drive 'em into the ground. Should have phase 2 up (GC8's) in a couple weeks after being out of town.
By less sag I mean the boosted lead sags far less than non-boosted because it carries less than half as much current. That was an assumption going in and one of the goals of phase 3 is to see how cycle life is affected (for the 29HMs as I have no control data for GC8s) by lowering the amp demands on the lead pack.I don't have detailed cell models, but this should explain why the Pb voltage sag was less.
It is an big electronics OM manufacturer in China they produce lithium cells as well.Not familiar with TCLs. Is that just a brand?
If nothing else there's very little lithium in one of these batteries, they're not all that toxic, and contain largely copper and aluminum by weight in the foils and terminals. I bet that you could find a local scrap yard that would take them for the aluminum and copper content alone.sorry if I have bothered you, I just really care about environment, and I keep thinking it is a delicate topic about using any kind of battery.
I wouldn't disturb you any more...
lead sags more under high load, and suffers from peukart's.which chemistry can handle high drain better?