Bull Crap pure and simple. Can't deny that.
FYMEGM Reactor
Hello all,
Its a bit premature to be putting this up, but I did promise a few people on my last thread that we have new technology that we are working on that promises better performance and range than the Nissan Leaf by using a DC Motor and Lead Acid BAtteries.
Its not much to look at, but its the technology that we are talking about. We are looking to get a better DC motor (Kostov or Warp) to drop into a prototype car using our reactor. We think that we have picked up where Tesla left off on his invention decades ago.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9720
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Ismael_Aviso_Self-Charging_Electric_Car
We have been talking to an AUstralian designer about creating a prototype car :
http://www.flemingjrod.com/gallery.htm
....since he has based operations with us in the Philippines. If it didnt have to be so damn light to compete with the Leaf or other cars, i'd love to see the second car used as my ol 1968 Camaro
OUr early numbers firing up the 11kw forklift motor looks like this:
@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } Current Use
FYMEGM 1800W (260V 7ah) 3amp draw per hour @ 40km/h
6ah / 3amp draw= 2ah x 40 km= 80km distance traveled from 1800W only.
BUT WHAT IF WE USE MARINE BATT HEAVY DUTY WITH 50ah RATING? (1694lbs + pack frame, cabling, connectors)
3 Packs w space for 8 per pack (use for 7only. 1 pack will have 8, 22 total)
EX 2000W gel (22 pieces 50ah) = 3amp draw per [email protected] 40km/h
50ah / 3amp per hour = 16.6 ah x 40km= 666.66 km
666.66 km x2 (44pieces 50ah 440V) = 1,333.33 km per charge
Of course we will have to fine tune the testing. We have only tested up to 40kmh and the forklift motor is a dinosaur. Department Of Energy and Department Of Science and TEch will conduct tests to verify our claims next week. Once perfected, we seek to have a product ready for licensing by next year
Its a bit premature to be putting this up, but I did promise a few people on my last thread that we have new technology that we are working on that promises better performance and range than the Nissan Leaf by using a DC Motor and Lead Acid BAtteries.
Its not much to look at, but its the technology that we are talking about. We are looking to get a better DC motor (Kostov or Warp) to drop into a prototype car using our reactor. We think that we have picked up where Tesla left off on his invention decades ago.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9720
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Ismael_Aviso_Self-Charging_Electric_Car
We have been talking to an AUstralian designer about creating a prototype car :
http://www.flemingjrod.com/gallery.htm
....since he has based operations with us in the Philippines. If it didnt have to be so damn light to compete with the Leaf or other cars, i'd love to see the second car used as my ol 1968 Camaro
OUr early numbers firing up the 11kw forklift motor looks like this:
@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } Current Use
FYMEGM 1800W (260V 7ah) 3amp draw per hour @ 40km/h
6ah / 3amp draw= 2ah x 40 km= 80km distance traveled from 1800W only.
BUT WHAT IF WE USE MARINE BATT HEAVY DUTY WITH 50ah RATING? (1694lbs + pack frame, cabling, connectors)
3 Packs w space for 8 per pack (use for 7only. 1 pack will have 8, 22 total)
EX 2000W gel (22 pieces 50ah) = 3amp draw per [email protected] 40km/h
50ah / 3amp per hour = 16.6 ah x 40km= 666.66 km
666.66 km x2 (44pieces 50ah 440V) = 1,333.33 km per charge
Of course we will have to fine tune the testing. We have only tested up to 40kmh and the forklift motor is a dinosaur. Department Of Energy and Department Of Science and TEch will conduct tests to verify our claims next week. Once perfected, we seek to have a product ready for licensing by next year
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
I'll accept what you are saying for now.
I'm just sharing to the community our findings, since this forum I believe is about expanding peoples knowledge.
I will, however, hand you back your statement to eat, or at least roll over your face once the Department Of Science and Technology verifies our claims
This is meant to help people, not inflate heads. Read the comments on the links, and try to wrap your head around it. I would assume if you know nothing about microwave engineering or circuit engineering, that would be the cause of your disgruntled nature. Time to get out of the stone ages and embrace technology and new findings
But then again, what do people know anyway, living in a 3rd world country
like we do eh? Surely not how to harness ambient energy and amplify harmonics from BEMF produced by the DC Motor! naaaaaaaaaaah! lol
Heh heh. No horns on us. But it seems to Gottdi that our tail is flicking.....
When we were crunching rough numbers I winced when I saw that one!
The amp draw was 3-5 amp, but its really hard to measure the true current draw to the reactor and how it works. HArd to measure what is drawn from the battery, and what is made by the reactor. CAlculations may be a bit off, but more or less that is what we have been getting when travelling 40kmh. Will have more conclusive data to post next week
VERIFIED FYMEGM REACTOR 140% efficiency
Here we go!
Test results just got in. Official results will be arriving next week, but unofficially it was released. We are one step closer to bringing the technology to market.
Understand that we are not here to bruise egos or make false claims. We are here to try and make a difference for everyone- and the world at that. Funding is all that is needed to finish the project so that we could finish the packaging design for commercial production.
We run great at higher voltages- less waste. Wouldnt it be great to have a dual Warp or Kostov in the engine bay to have both efficiency and power when you want it? Would'nt you want that? I sure would! Do you really want to spend thousands on LI-Ion batteries?
This meek example ran off only 1 battery and did better than 14kms. Didnt even discharge when powering an 11kw forklift motor. This is the future, and it could be made available for everyone soon. Just need to bring it to the right people that are willing to license the invention for mass production.
With this type of power generated, with further testing it is possible to make it a closed loop. Never plug in ever again. Have a look:
http://keelynet.com/
http://pesn.com/2011/02/24/9501772_Philippine_DOE_Verifies_Aviso_Self-Charging_EV/
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/
http://www.overunity.com/index.php
These represent the total WEBSITES of all LATEST technology research & development of TOP Scientists , Inventors , engineer's and universities all over the world.
It IS possible
-AMPLIFIED
Here we go!
Test results just got in. Official results will be arriving next week, but unofficially it was released. We are one step closer to bringing the technology to market.
Understand that we are not here to bruise egos or make false claims. We are here to try and make a difference for everyone- and the world at that. Funding is all that is needed to finish the project so that we could finish the packaging design for commercial production.
We run great at higher voltages- less waste. Wouldnt it be great to have a dual Warp or Kostov in the engine bay to have both efficiency and power when you want it? Would'nt you want that? I sure would! Do you really want to spend thousands on LI-Ion batteries?
This meek example ran off only 1 battery and did better than 14kms. Didnt even discharge when powering an 11kw forklift motor. This is the future, and it could be made available for everyone soon. Just need to bring it to the right people that are willing to license the invention for mass production.
With this type of power generated, with further testing it is possible to make it a closed loop. Never plug in ever again. Have a look:
http://keelynet.com/
http://pesn.com/2011/02/24/9501772_Philippine_DOE_Verifies_Aviso_Self-Charging_EV/
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/
http://www.overunity.com/index.php
These represent the total WEBSITES of all LATEST technology research & development of TOP Scientists , Inventors , engineer's and universities all over the world.
It IS possible
-AMPLIFIED
Re: VERIFIED FYMEGM REACTOR 140% efficiency
An educated person would look at the results of the tests to see what was achieved. 140 % efficiency means that is the best technology that is available IN THE WORLD.
It would be way too easy to label you a fool, so I will not waste my time in naming you one Consider this:
Major automakers are spending BILLIONS per month to even try to break "Over Unity". Do you know what that means? I included a link to the post earlier so that you can LEARN so you can speak with KNOWLEDGE.
We were able to make a forklift motor run on 1 battery. That in itself is IMPOSSIBLE. Yet we did it and make it over 90% efficient (from its original 60 % efficiency rating). The technology exists to do this. Believe it!
At its current level of state, we can just go on this and move to mass production. "Further testing" entails the use of a proper high speed traction motor and fine tuning for 100kms +.
Doing one better than that would mean looping for self charge. If we were able to achieve 140%, it would just mean doubling our current ratings and fine tuning the components to achieve the state of self charge.
This is just fine tuning Gottdi, it just takes time, proper materials and a bit more money. Not necessarily your money Gottdi, I know that you are using it to spend on buying more batteries to make your car go further......
Don't hate us. Its way too easy to hate...
Cheer us on instead, because one day this will be bought "off the shelf" so that you too can purchase it "at any time". We aim to make it cheap, so that everyone can enjoy the privilege. Gas is definitely not getting any cheaper!
An educated person would look at the results of the tests to see what was achieved. 140 % efficiency means that is the best technology that is available IN THE WORLD.
It would be way too easy to label you a fool, so I will not waste my time in naming you one
Consider this: Major automakers are spending BILLIONS per month to even try to break "Over Unity". Do you know what that means? I included a link to the post earlier so that you can LEARN so you can speak with KNOWLEDGE.
We were able to make a forklift motor run on 1 battery. That in itself is IMPOSSIBLE. Yet we did it and make it over 90% efficient (from its original 60 % efficiency rating). The technology exists to do this. Believe it!
At its current level of state, we can just go on this and move to mass production. "Further testing" entails the use of a proper high speed traction motor and fine tuning for 100kms +.
Doing one better than that would mean looping for self charge. If we were able to achieve 140%, it would just mean doubling our current ratings and fine tuning the components to achieve the state of self charge.
This is just fine tuning Gottdi, it just takes time, proper materials and a bit more money. Not necessarily your money Gottdi, I know that you are using it to spend on buying more batteries to make your car go further......
Don't hate us. Its way too easy to hate...
Cheer us on instead, because one day this will be bought "off the shelf" so that you too can purchase it "at any time". We aim to make it cheap, so that everyone can enjoy the privilege. Gas is definitely not getting any cheaper!
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
