DIY Electric Car Forums banner

ICE on a trailer?

7876 Views 78 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  brian_
Hi,


I live in a small city in a low-population area in the central USA.



I've been interested in electric vehicles since before auto makers started releasing them a few years back. (Don't talk about the early days of autos, I'm talking like Chevy Volt)


My problem with typical EV projects is that they focus on some econobox car, which is impractical for me. I'm 6'4" (193 cm) and those cars just don't hold somebody my size. Not only that, I'm a foster parent and we have some variable number of kids, and then the people in my real family, and then a couple dogs, and whatever fishing/camping gear I want to take with me.


My current vehicle is a 15 passenger van. It's a 2010 Chevy Econoline 3500, extended. There are 4 bench seats and 2 buckets up front. 3 of the bench seats hold 3 people, the last one holds 4. Usually the back seat is out to make room for dogs, but I have literally had every other seat used. The van has a V8 in it, and it's adequate for acceleration but nothing to write home about. The most economic speed is 55-60 mph. My area generally has 2-lane blacktop roads at about 65 mph, and interstate speeds of 80 mph. The existing ICE gets terrible fuel economy in town, usually less than 10 mpg. On the highway it can get close to 20 mph depending on the wind and such.


My normal day involves driving around town a few miles, easy for an EV project. Most days the van just doesn't move at all. But when we take a trip, we use the van. When we take a trip, we WILL go more than 300 miles round trip.


So here's my question finally:
Consider a van conversion, set up for in-town driving. I can't sacrifice a whole lot of weight to batteries as I use the van to carry a lot of people. But they're little people usually, maybe as many as 5 adults but the rest are miniatures. I figure this is a do-able EV conversion and probably straightforward.


The van has an OEM trailer hitch, something like 7500 lbs weight rating.


What I'm thinking of is a trailer for trips. Probably double-axle. It would have:
1. An internal combustion engine, possibly the same one that's in the van now.
2. A big fuel tank.
3. A storage area for luggage.
4. More batteries.
5. Possibly motors to assist with driving force.


My idea is that, in town, the van is a pure EV. When I go on a trip, I hook up the trailer which converts it into a hybrid. I would obviously need a big high-voltage umbilical going up to the van, and a pretty good control unit.


Is this a feasible idea, or are there too many safety or legality concerns? AFAIK there are no laws forbidding a running engine on a trailer, but I haven't really researched it.


Thanks for your time.
See less See more
21 - 40 of 79 Posts
Another thing to keep in mind here is that I rarely travel more than once a month. So this trailer, it's likely to go a long time between uses. My daily driver as it were will be a really big plug-in pure EV that I plug into the wall outlet when I get home. When I get range anxiety, I hook up to the evil ICE trailer and do what I need to do.


I don't see a diesel as a necessarily bad thing here, if they can be as reliable and efficient as I'm thinking. If the pollution regulations are too tight then I'll clearly need to do something else.


I've recently seen articles about opposed cylinder diesels with a common combustion chamber instead of a common crankshaft. They're reaching thermal efficiencies near 60%. I think if diesel were ridiculously over-regulated then there would be less research on improving them right?
See less See more
I was thinking of putting raw 3-phase AC through the trailer connector. Thinking now on it that probably won't work so well, a generator set will probably be either 240 or 480, or maybe 400. There's probably no reason to route around that circuitry, and the EV charging circuitry will be set up for one of those too most likely.
If using a ready-made genset I can see doing this, preferably at 240 volts to match existing Level 2 EV charging standards... but 3-phase Level 2 charging is only used in Europe, as far as I know.

Multiple conversions are annoying and inefficient, which is why it would be nice to do it all on the generator trailer so that there is no conversion on the van side at all. If you can get a 3-phase alternator at a suitable voltage, you could rectify and regulate to the van's voltage without additional conversions. Of course the rectifier and inverter could be in either the trailer or the van.

An old-style generator set runs at a fixed speed to make 60 hertz (or 50 hertz outside of North America) power, and so doesn't run at its most efficient speed for the load of the moment. A current "inverter" generator runs at variable speed, produces high-frequency 3-phase AC (which the vehicle's charger likely won't handle well), and rectifies that to feed an inverter to produce the desired output. Feeding the final output of an inverter generator set to the van means an unnecessary inverter stage.

If you want the option of using the trailer as a mobile generator to power stuff other than the van (such as powering a house in emergencies), you might want to ensure that it has a 240/120 volt 60 Hz output available.

What sort of voltage does a highway-capable (65mph) EV run these days? It would be good to avoid unnecessary voltage conversions through all this, which is why I was thinking of 3-phase through the trailer connector.
360 volts (nominal) from a battery with 96 lithium cells in series (and of course some number of cells in parallel at the lowest level) is the current typical production EV practice. DIY EVs using brushed DC motors and AC induction motors sold for conversions necessarily run lower voltage. That's why existing high-rate DC charging standards allow up to 500 volts.

I was also thinking of gadget power in the vehicle, we have a ton of phone chargers and tablets and whatever crap we need for baby food. How many people run an AC wall outlet in the car? It's either that or a whole crapload of 12v or USB plugs. Or maybe all of the above.
Low-power 120 V AC outlets are common in the better-equipped trims of even non-hybrid non-EV vehicles.

Back in the day, EV builders had a high voltage battery pack and then a 12v battery for the automotive systems. Is this still the practice or do you run an inverter-pwm regulator for that sort of thing?
Current production practice, which DIY builders seem to be following, is to have a converter from high voltage to 12V, but still have a battery on the 12 volt system to smooth out peak demands and provide power before the DC-to-DC converter is powered on.
See less See more
Interesting stuff I didn't know there.


The generators I've seen run output higher than the official output and then are regulated down to something standard. A 480v generator may well have a raw output of 600v but then get regulated down to something reasonable. I know that the output of these things has gotten much cleaner over the years, so it's possible that there are some pretty sophisticated electronics in there to give clean power.


No matter what the van will need to accept 240v because that's what is likely to be in the garage when I charge it, and that's what is supplied to homes in the USA. But as you mentioned there are reasons to want to send over the raw 3-phase too, if it gets away from an unnecessary conversion.


The regulation and conversion circuitry to go from 3-phase to single-phase needs to be somewhere, and the circuitry to adapt to the charger's raw input voltage needs to be somewhere. Unlike most EVs I don't think space is going to be a problem here, and having the most direct voltage conversion seems to be a good thing.


But I can also say from experience that trailer electrical connections can be problematic, just because they're flexible connections being bounced around, bent, twisted, rained on and sprayed with gravel and mud and part of a racoon. While it would clearly be necessary to put 240v through that connector, it may not be advisable to double it for safety reasons. Either that or I'll need some pretty amazing safety circuitry.


It's my understanding that a commercially built generator will very possibly have 400-600v circuitry somewhere, and it seems like such a shame to not just send it over to charge the pack. But I'm not sure what sort of noise will be on that line, and whether the charger can handle filtering it. Lots more questions than I started with now.


Then there's a distinct possibility that the generators I'm thinking of may be unsatisfactory for some reason and that I would need to build something from scratch. Which is a drag to me.
See less See more
You know, almost every time I do something nonstandard when there's a standard, I regret it later. You're saying there's a charging standard voltage, so I think the generator needs to supply that voltage. This opinion will be final until I change my mind yet again.


Somebody said something about satisfactory motors being hard to find? AC induction motors is what I'd prefer. Was that with respect to a dual motor system, or a single motor system?


I made a comment about 4 wheel drive earlier, it would be handy but I didn't think it would be workable. Maybe it would be an advantage to try to find some front suspension parts that would work with 4wd? A separate motor for each wheel? Maybe a suburban's front suspension might be adequate?


I've looked into the mechanics of 4-link custom suspension, and I was thinking of either building or buying something for the rear (prefer buying!). Maybe I should consider the front as well? 4-link is incredibly better than stock suspension when it's done right. Typically used with drag racing and with off-road vehicles. This would be neither, but I could seriously benefit from 4wd in this area. I think with ACIM motors all I would need to do is turn off the front wheels when driving slowly. I doubt that spinning the motors would be a huge drain on power at low speed.
See less See more
Go look at a construction site where they're putting up an apartment building, a hotel or some commercial building especially in a remote location. They have generators on wheels that have 4 cylinder automotive-sized engines or even bigger. Most of the ones I've seen are diesels, but the key here is that they are designed to run as a generator: constant speed, reasonably constant load, day in and day out. They'll be there until the power is hooked up to the site.
The problem with those is the size: for instance, a roughly 50 kW unit from Kohler weighs two tons. Automotive needs are quite different from stationary industrial needs, so although the underlying technology is the same (including sharing some base engines and using similar generator technology), the details are all different.

Constant-speed operation is a bit of an issue, too. A typical industrial unit will run a 1800 rpm all the time, to produce 60 Hz power. It might not be very efficient (and isn't quiet) at low load, but who cares on an industrial or construction site? That can be okay in a series hybrid, but it can means starting and stopping the genset often so that when it runs it only runs at high efficiency.
I've recently seen articles about opposed cylinder diesels with a common combustion chamber instead of a common crankshaft. They're reaching thermal efficiencies near 60%.
The people pushing the most recent opposed-piston diesels are great marketers, but a little short on integrity. This is old technology coming around again, and inherently has no substantial advantage.

If the pollution regulations are too tight then I'll clearly need to do something else.

... I think if diesel were ridiculously over-regulated then there would be less research on improving them right?
I doubt that anyone will ever even check the emissions of whatever you mount on a trailer, let alone regulate it.

I think that the effect of regulations is exactly the opposite. Something has to drive improvement, and if the only driver is the cost of engines and their operation, they will get ever cheaper, filthier, and less efficient. Automotive (including trucks) diesels are in an unfortunate state at the moment, much like gasoline engines of the dark days of the 1970's: they are dealing with new demands, and don't have it well sorted out yet.

Diesel fans often claim that some unreasonable demands are being placed on their engines, but in fact the nearly free ride they've had for decades is just ending as they are being regulated like gasoline engines.
See less See more
New engine designs always have enthusiastic marketing. If third-party test results support it though it's not just marketing. Unfortunately I can't find the article I read the other day, so I can't tell who did the tests.


Emissions checks on a trailer:


A few years ago I went to Colombia. The country in South America, not one of the cities in the USA. (those are spelled Columbia anyway)


There are no pollution laws to speak of there. There are way fewer cars per capita, but not a single one of them has a catalytic converter or any other type of emission control. You could be out on a mountain with only one car for a mile around, and when you turn that car on your eyes burn. But go to Bogota, a city the size of NYC, and you think somebody dropped tear gas on you.


FWIW I think the emission controls are a good thing. They're pretty much unregulated in my state, but I think if this thing goes through I'll actually have what emission controls I can get on the trailer regardless of regulations.
See less See more
I think that the effect of regulations is exactly the opposite. Something has to drive improvement, and if the only driver is the cost of engines and their operation, they will get ever cheaper, filthier, and less efficient. Automotive (including trucks) diesels are in an unfortunate state at the moment, much like gasoline engines of the dark days of the 1970's: they are dealing with new demands, and don't have it well sorted out yet.

Diesel fans often claim that some unreasonable demands are being placed on their engines, but in fact the nearly free ride they've had for decades is just ending as they are being regulated like gasoline engines.
Total nonsense Brian - today's diesels are several hundred times better than the 70's - if anything is getting the "free ride" its the petrol engines - they are permitted to produce actual poisons! - while the diesels are not even permitted to release chemicals that in 97% of the USA are effectively fertiliser
I kinda want to back up to the start with a couple key questions....

- Why do you want an electric vehicle?

- What is your budget/what are you thinking you'll spend?

You have basically described the worst case scenario for an EV. High weight. No extra weight. Poor aero. Long range. Mountainous terrain. Occasional use.

You gas milage: http://www.fuelly.com/car/chevrolet/express_3500/2010 -- Something in the range of 10-15mpg.

Most days the van just doesn't move at all.
EVs make the most sense when you want to save money on gas, with frequent daily use, short range.

You need the frequent use to justify the investment in batteries (if not the conversion itself). This is a huge sunk cost up front whether you use the vehicle daily or never. If you were spending $12,000/year in gas, that's financially wasteful and it's easy to say you should invest in electrical. If you spend $300/year in gas, it'll never be worth it.

You need the short range so that you don't need an outrageously-sized, expense, and heavy battery pack.

You have huge power requirements because you have an unaerodynamic shape pushing lots of air out of the way at high speed. You need to be able to accelerate all that weight at a decent speed. You need to be able to push that weight up a hill, at a fast speed. For a long period of time.

...

I love supporting projects just for the sake of "I want to" or "It interests me", so if that's the case, do as you please.

But even though we're here because we're passionate about EVs, if you came here with your finished EV, a big heavy van with 2-4 huge electric motors, and a hitch with a huge genny and a trailer...

... I would actually suggest "Why not remove the motors and batteries and put that engine under the hood of the van instead?".

I think your current situation is actually the best solution to your circumstances. If you need a cargo trailer, just go buy a simple, cheap cargo trailer, done.

Another thought, yeah you've got a big family now but when the kids become teenagers they'll drive their own cars (and you can force them to chauffeur their younger sibblings, a time-honored family practice :p ), and you won't be making as many family trips. So that means the time before you have to pay off this expensive conversion is narrower that you might imagine.

Just peeing on the parade a little, as a sober-second-thought.
See less See more
Total nonsense Brian - today's diesels are several hundred times better than the 70's...
Duncan, apparently you didn't understand my post. I didn't compare the diesels of today to the diesels of the 1970's (obviously they have changed, to make them cheaper to operate and to meet regulations). I compared the situation of gasoline engines in the 1970's (struggling to meet changing regulations and not working well) to the situation of diesel engines today (struggling to meet changing regulations and not meeting them reliably).

... if anything is getting the "free ride" its the petrol engines - they are permitted to produce actual poisons! - while the diesels are not even permitted to release chemicals that in 97% of the USA are effectively fertiliser
I'll leave an uninformed deep discussion of the effects of pollutants and which emissions are regulated to another forum, since this is supposed to be about EVs... and in this case, hybrids. All that's relevant to this discucssion is
  • an industrial engine will not meet automotive standards (of performance or emissions)
  • an old diesel will not even come close to meeting current standards of emissions
  • a current diesel may not operate both reliably and cleanly at reasonable cost (current systems are routinely bypassed or disabled)
Anyone who wants a mostly-electric vehicle and doesn't care about exhaust emissions can just run any older engine that they find reliable and cheap.
See less See more
Since the EV with generator trailer thing is difficult to do well, there is another option... two vans:
  1. one converted to EV for local use (maybe buy one which is cheap because it has a dead engine and/or transmission)
  2. one left stock for longer trips - no trailer required
Or a "Battery Trailer" - and use it for your house to load shift to get cheap (night rate) power when it's not needed as a range extender
I kinda want to back up to the start with a couple key questions....
Fair enough, and they're good questions.

- Why do you want an electric vehicle?
A number of reasons. In the order I think of them:

  1. I've wanted one almost since I heard of the idea.
  2. I believe that, battery pack notwithstanding, they can be more reliable than an ICE.
  3. I want better fuel economy in town. I love to just get in and drive for awhile, and with my current living situation (foster kids) it's difficult because I'm either leaving my wife to take care of kids, or I'm in a big van that gets ~10mpg in town on a good day.
  4. I want to take steps toward a cleaner environment.
  5. I'm sure I can come up with more answers that are still honest. Those are the big ones.
I'd like to point out that while EVs are almost certainly cleaner while operating, it's clear that the manufacturing environmental cost of a converted vehicle is much higher than a standard one, because you manufactured everything in the standard vehicle, took some of the stuff out and then put more stuff in.

I also realize that an EV means a longer tailpipe. I'd like to get some sort of green power at my home, and that will likely need to happen first. What seems to be most practical would be solar with saltwater batteries.

- What is your budget/what are you thinking you'll spend?
I'm not sure. I know that converting an EV will easily spend all the money you would have spent on gas buying the electric components. I can't imagine a van project (without trailer) to be less than $30k USD. I'm not rich, and this would be a big chunk of cash for me.

That said, vans have been the same thing for decades. Other cars change shape, the van is just a big box going down the road. Mine is in good shape. No rust I can find, no significant dings. If I maintain it I think could keep it as an EV for a long time and not wish for something else.

I've researched DIY cars before. I was looking at small cars back then, but I know that people spend a ton of cash on them and have a lot of problems getting things right. I've also talked to a few DIY EV owners and looked at their cars in person, and I know that once they get them done the guys are usually happy with them.

You have basically described the worst case scenario for an EV....

You gas milage: http://www.fuelly.com/car/chevrolet/express_3500/2010 -- Something in the range of 10-15mpg.
Yes. Only it's hilly terrain, not mountainous. I live in the Missouri River valley. Once I'm on top it's the Great Plains. Mostly flat-ish but lots of rivers and occasional relatively sharp altitude adjustments in the in the altitude which are probably on the order of 1000 feet or more. going down any one of these hills on cruise control in this van at 65 mph will overspeed the cruise and I'll be going 75 or 80 by the time I reach the bottom. Probably 7%-8% grade I'm guessing.

Winter in-town mileage is more like 8, 10 in summer. When I drive a distance I choose my route and my speed to get best economy. I have had it as high as 21 mpg round trip economy over about 6 hours total, and it's usually above 18 in summer.

Occasional use: Most of our driving is in town. We both work. I don't need to drive to work. If at all possible we engineer our trips so that one or two adults takes one or two kids in the Toyota to do what we need to do. If we need more people then we take the van.

We like taking everyone if we can, and if the kids are all behaving. If the van would be more economic to drive in town, we would probably take everyone when we go shopping or running around town. It would certainly see much more use than it does right now.

EVs make the most sense when you want to save money on gas, with frequent daily use, short range.

You need the frequent use to justify the investment in batteries
...
You need the short range so that you don't need an outrageously-sized, expense, and heavy battery pack.
I guess part of what I'm hoping for is for the van to be more frequently used. I don't see us spending a lot less money driving it, because in my past I tend to have a budget for transportation and I use all of it whether I actually had someplace to go or not.

The van costs $80 to fill up, give or take depending on gas prices. Usually every other week unless we travel. If we're going out of town that gets us almost 500 miles. Per ton mile of people/cargo (not including vehicle weight), loaded full of kids, the van is actually much more economic to drive than the Toyota.

The short range part is why I'm talking about a trailer, so I don't need a literal extra ton of batteries. The trailer is for the infrequently used edge case. Normally a 30 mile daily range for the van is great, and a 60 mile range would be fantastic. So 30 days a month it would be charged from the wall outlet.

You have huge power requirements because...
True as far as it goes. Again, I'm not looking at pure numbers here comparing economy of a van to economy of a Toyota Corolla. The Toyota gets 35 mpg at 60 mph fully loaded. The van gets almost 20 at the same speed fully loaded. 4 people at 35 or 12 people, 2 dogs, 3 coolers and fishing gear at 20. I'll take the latter. Drop a bit if I have the (existing) trailer pulling kayaks.
... I would actually suggest "Why not remove the motors and batteries and put that engine under the hood of the van instead?".

I think your current situation is actually the best solution to your circumstances. If you need a cargo trailer, just go buy a simple, cheap cargo trailer, done.
I hear you. I really do. "I want to" is a huge part of this, and ever since I was in my 20s that has been an adequate reason to do most of my stupid projects. Many of them have been exactly that--stupid. I don't feel the need to justify projects that satisfy my curiosity to any naysayer. That's not defensive, I'm just saying that somebody else's opinion doesn't matter nearly as much to me as walking my own path or learning something. I'm not a teenager anymore. I'm 53. I have some bit of experience with building things and with having successes and failures, both of which tend to cost much more than I'd anticipated.

I don't feel that "saving money" is an adequate excuse to buy or build any EV or hybrid. So far as I can tell, the statistical numbers don't support saving money when considering the total cost of ownership. Even commercially built EVs don't likely pay back the additional cost. So zero that out of my equation.

That said, the cost of tooling around town or the local countryside DOES matter. I see turning this van into an EV which, ideally, would double the "money economy" of driving (miles per unit cost) as a big deal, and I would still spend at least as much money driving it as I do now.

Another thought, yeah you've got a big family now but when the kids become teenagers they'll drive their own cars (and you can force them to chauffeur their younger sibblings, a time-honored family practice :p ), and you won't be making as many family trips. So that means the time before you have to pay off this expensive conversion is narrower that you might imagine.

Just peeing on the parade a little, as a sober-second-thought.
Last statement first. I ask this sort of question to people in other forums. You are NOT peeing on the parade, you're asking questions that need to be asked BEFORE the n00b spends a shit-ton of money on something that won't get them what they're after.

Teenagers: We're foster parents. My wife and I don't have kids of our own. We tend to stick to the under-4 set as far as preferred placements. The number of kids varies from month to month, and is usually somewhere between 2 and 7. There are 3 adults in the house, and will be until somebody dies most likely. It's possible and hopeful that we might be able to adopt a couple of the kids, but I'm not counting on it.

Kids come here, they stay a few days or a few months, and one of them has been here 2 years and is likely to stay longer. Then they go somewhere else, either back with their family or to a new foster home that can better care for their needs. We feel that kids should have a safe place to grow up, and a happy place to live. We hope that their families can pull it together and get through whatever trouble they're having, but sometimes it just doesn't happen that way.

I've had dozens of hobbies over the years. None of them has been as fulfilling as fostering kids. If a kid comes into your house, you can't help but love them. If you don't then you're not doing them any good at all. When they leave they take a piece of me with them every time. We get money for caring for the kids, but if I don't have the kids we make more money by ourselves. We spend our own money on top of what we get to make their lives better.

Those of you reading this, if your life is empty of meaning maybe you should consider being a foster parent. Every part of the world is short of people who will step up and help out. Every kid is worth the time you spend putting a smile on their face. Kids come to you scared and hurting, and sometimes a little thin, and you feed them and make them happy. There is no better feeling.

Sorry for the shameless foster care plug. At any rate our situation is different. We may see a couple of these guys grow up -- we hope to have some over for holidays when they have their own families -- but in general I think we'll have baby seats in the van for many years to come. And if not, the seats come out and there's always a use for a big van.
See less See more
Since the EV with generator trailer thing is difficult to do well, there is another option... two vans:
  1. one converted to EV for local use (maybe buy one which is cheap because it has a dead engine and/or transmission)
  2. one left stock for longer trips - no trailer required

I'm not convinced that the generator trailer is difficult to do well. The EV itself would be aimed at 30-60 mile range and I'd use battery packs from a hybrid or commercial EV for it if I can find them. So lighter weight, leaving more of my full capacity for cargo.


The generator trailer, we've had some discussion about how to implement it but the balancing is extremely straightforward. The generator trailer makes the EV itself much easier. While I have been talking about a commercially built genset, I'm not married to the idea. If it's cheaper or significantly lighter to get a reliable generator which is more appropriate for my use case then I'm open to the idea.



The idea of the trailer is to have it kick on when the battery gets low, run full blast until it's charged and then shut off again. Or, near the end of the programmed trip, have the trailer top off the battery just as I arrive, letting me drop the trailer off somewhere if it's practical so I can park in normal slots found in malls or whatever.



Or a "Battery Trailer" - and use it for your house to load shift to get cheap (night rate) power when it's not needed as a range extender

Some of the trips I take are 14 hours each direction. Maybe twice a year. I don't think a battery trailer is adequate for that. But if it were only a few hundred miles, that might be a neat idea.




I don't see long trips as viable for a pure EV. Not in my area. Part of all this is that the vast majority of my driving either vehicle is in town. I see two (or three) projects here:

  1. A short-range EV with big motors because it's a big vehicle.
  2. A generator trailer for trips, to mitigate the fact of a short range EV.
  3. A house installation for solar. (not related to this forum)
The way I see it, I stand to gain miles-per-dollar for short range driving, which is what I really want, and almost certainly will lose a bit of miles-per-dollar when going a distance. If I'm lucky I may break even on that, but an extra axle really bites into fuel economy.
See less See more
Having done some calculations on the van's cost per mile right now:



  • Winter in-town driving, fuel costs generally are up in winter for reason, I've had an actual cost per mile of $0.46 USD, probably higher. Based on highest gas prices in the area over the past 3 years I can see $0.50 per mile.
  • Summer driving in town, with current fuel costs, $0.35.
  • Best-case economy highway mileage, current gas prices: $0.13
  • Average case economy highway mileage, current gas prices: $0.15.
If I can double the miles per unit cost in town in pure EV mode, I would consider this a successful project in that respect. There are of course other considerations, but just getting that aspect of it out there.


Edit: And in the past year, with the minimalist use of the vehicle I described above, I estimate having spent more than USD $2000.00 on gas for in-town driving.
See less See more
1. I've wanted one almost since I heard of the idea.
2. I believe that, battery pack notwithstanding, they can be more reliable than an ICE.
3. I want better fuel economy in town. I love to just get in and drive for awhile, and with my current living situation (foster kids) it's difficult because I'm either leaving my wife to take care of kids, or I'm in a big van that gets ~10mpg in town on a good day.
4. I want to take steps toward a cleaner environment.
1 - I had a feeling that this was a "because I want to" project. I'm all aboard.

2 - Ehn. You're driving a 2010. It'll last you another 20 years with very minimal work. You'll be 73 by then. You will put more work into your EV than it will ever redeem in bonus reliability.

3 - That you'll get.

4 - 50% of the carbon/energy/whatever footprint of a vehicle is in manufacturing it. All the gas you burn in the vehicle's 20-30-year life only makes up the other half. You're driving a newer vehicle. So be rebuilding it, you're wasting huge amounts of the energy of its life. Roughly speaking, energy use scales with cost. Things have cost proportional to the resources they took to make them, if they didn't take that amount of resources, they would be cheaper. Cost effective is generally environmentally effective, and you're probably net negative on the environment.

I guess part of what I'm hoping for is for the van to be more frequently used.
That makes sense too. If you'd do a lot more driving if it wasn't so expensive, that adds a bunch of value to you beyond what your past experience would indicate.

Sorry for the shameless foster care plug.
Naw it's good. It's good to hear about people's passions and what drives them. I'm glad you've found a life that's rewarding for you.

...

I'm going to piggyback on Brian's suggestion from earlier and it's where I was kind of leaning with my questions. I think you need two vans.

At least, temporarily.

It sounds like you need a van. Most EV conversions that people do, especially because they just want to, take way longer than they would have predicted. I'm 15 months elapsed into what could realistically have been a weekend project, but, life gets in the way.

You don't want to be in a rush. You'll run into headaches you didn't anticipate. It might take you a year to get it done.

Since your van is currently in good condition, I would keep it as such. Buy a second, older van, find one with a blown engine if you can, but good bones, and convert that one. Then when it's done, sell the good one. Or, don't, just add a trailer to it and use it for long trips.

In terms of effort, 2 vans is easier. In terms of conversions, not having to worry about a generator and second fuel tanks and all that is way faster and cheaper. Motor and batteries and you're good. Maybe cheap enough to buy the second van carcass. You should be able to get a 15-year-old one for, what, $2k? If you're looking to spend $30k, that's pretty small in comparison. That's what a used genny is going to cost you, minimum.

For long trips you just eat the cost of gas 100% of the time, whether trailer is parked or not. But around town, your 90% use case is electrical.

...

Another option you might like even less...

Don't buy a second van. Don't build a generator trailer. Build an EV push trailer.

You'd need a junkyard diff, probably a single big motor, and minimal batteries. And a trailer skeleton. Done. Mount it however you want, super easy.

The tradeoff being that now when you're tootling around town every day, you've got the trailer with you.

As a bonus, you could charge it by regening while driving. And it's much safer than a gasoline push trailer regening the van up front.

Bonus.. you could hook it up to anything with a hitch.

It would also be an easy way to get your feet wet with EVs, without taking use away from the van. If you want to cannibalize it later for a full EV conversion down the road, maybe on a second van or whatever, you still can in about 15 minutes.

You could probably get it all done for $5k.

It's probably not what you envisioned, but, food for thought.
See less See more
1 - I had a feeling that this was a "because I want to" project. I'm all aboard.

2 - Ehn. You're driving a 2010. It'll last you another 20 years with very minimal work. You'll be 73 by then. You will put more work into your EV than it will ever redeem in bonus reliability.

3 - That you'll get.

4 - 50% of the carbon/energy/whatever footprint of a vehicle is in manufacturing it. All the gas you burn in the vehicle's 20-30-year life only makes up the other half. You're driving a newer vehicle. So be rebuilding it, you're wasting huge amounts of the energy of its life. Roughly speaking, energy use scales with cost. Things have cost proportional to the resources they took to make them, if they didn't take that amount of resources, they would be cheaper. Cost effective is generally environmentally effective, and you're probably net negative on the environment.

Agreed, more or less.



...

I'm going to piggyback on Brian's suggestion from earlier and it's where I was kind of leaning with my questions. I think you need two vans.

At least, temporarily.

Quite possible. I'm investigating if it's worth my effort at this point.



...
In terms of effort, 2 vans is easier. In terms of conversions, not having to worry about a generator and second fuel tanks and all that is way faster and cheaper. Motor and batteries and you're good. Maybe cheap enough to buy the second van carcass. You should be able to get a 15-year-old one for, what, $2k? If you're looking to spend $30k, that's pretty small in comparison. That's what a used genny is going to cost you, minimum.

For long trips you just eat the cost of gas 100% of the time, whether trailer is parked or not. But around town, your 90% use case is electrical.

I don't see the trailer as the expensive part here. Probably right though that 2 vans might be easier.



...

Another option you might like even less...

Don't buy a second van. Don't build a generator trailer. Build an EV push trailer.

Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope.



No push trailer, period. I've pulled trailers for a lot of miles. Enough crap goes wrong with them that I will absolutely not make a push trailer. we discussed it earlier in the thread.
See less See more
I will absolutely not make a push trailer. we discussed it earlier in the thread.
Well, that was a gasoline push trailer that you'd use to recharge batteries by regen braking on the lead vehicle.

This is just an electric push trailer. No braking, no charging. Unless you want to charge the batteries from the engine, in which case it's just like pulling a slightly heavier trailer.

But, I get it. You want an EV. Not a trailer :p
Don't buy a second van. Don't build a generator trailer. Build an EV push trailer.

You'd need a junkyard diff, probably a single big motor, and minimal batteries. And a trailer skeleton. Done. Mount it however you want, super easy.
Why would the batteries be "minimal"? It would need the same capacity as any EV for vehicle of this mass... no, more because it is so heavy and has so much drag.

The tradeoff being that now when you're tootling around town every day, you've got the trailer with you.
That tradeoff is a huge handicap. I can't imagine wanting to be stuck with a trailer for every trip, even short local errands.

And it's much safer than a gasoline push trailer regening the van up front.
Pushing the van with a trailer to keep the van moving is not much different from pushing the van with a trailer for through-the-road battery charging (which is not regenerative braking). Pushing the van with a trailer hard enough to accelerate the van is downright scary. :eek:

No push trailer, period. I've pulled trailers for a lot of miles. Enough crap goes wrong with them that I will absolutely not make a push trailer.
I'm with Ken on this one!

Well, that was a gasoline push trailer that you'd use to recharge batteries by regen braking on the lead vehicle.

This is just an electric push trailer. No braking, no charging. Unless you want to charge the batteries from the engine, in which case it's just like pulling a slightly heavier trailer.
It is simpler, but it is still a trailer pushing the van. This truly is putting the cart before the horse, in a physical sense rather than as the usual metaphor for lack of planning.
Well, that was a gasoline push trailer that you'd use to recharge batteries by regen braking on the lead vehicle.

This is just an electric push trailer. No braking, no charging. Unless you want to charge the batteries from the engine, in which case it's just like pulling a slightly heavier trailer.

But, I get it. You want an EV. Not a trailer :p

I never contemplated a push trailer of any kind.


The closest I came was in my first post, where I pondered powering the trailer wheels to reduce force on the van's motors. In my mind it would be operated the same as hydraulic trailer brakes: The hitch has a slide which, when the van moves forward, the trailer motor would accelerate to match. The van ball would have zero force for acceleration and stopping. Only turning and the tongue weight would affect the ball.


By my second post I realized just how much of a cluster-fuck that would be if the controls got messed up, possibly killing someone. I also realized by then that it would be simpler and cheaper to put motors on the van adequate for pulling the trailer.




Using a push trailer to regenerate from the van... Let's see how well that works. By rule of thumb one can expect regen to recoup about 10% of the energy. So we have all the losses associated to get power to the wheels, and then you push the van forward. And from there you lose 90% of whatever's actually "on the road" by using regen.


Or you could just run a wire forward from the generator on the trailer and lose maybe 1% max. I see absolutely no reason to throw away 90% of the energy of fuel just so I can use a push trailer, which is a profound safety hazard at best.


Alternately, I could just leave my van as it is, buy a trailer, put a big open drum of diesel fuel on it, light that on fire and drive around town hoping no burning fuel spills out on the streets, the trailer, the van or nearby cars. That would actually be much much cheaper than the push trailer and every bit as effective.


Sorry about the sarcasm. I would actually rather haul around the burning barrel of diesel fuel than use a push trailer.


Hopefully that's settled.


If somebody still thinks it's worth discussion, please post links to at least 20 commercially available push trailers sold in the USA.
See less See more
21 - 40 of 79 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top