Joined
·
3,143 Posts
While working on my prototype for a flying capacitor BMS with charging capability for the bottom cell using the entire (4 cell) pack, I got to thinking that, instead of charging that one cell and using traditional shunt current balancing, why not design a charger for a single LiFePO4 or LiPo (or even lead-acid), with integral BMS and daisy-chain communication?
Consider that a 12 kW charger, like the EMW unit I was working on, costs about $2000 and can handle something like 100 cells at 120 watts/cell, and also needs a BMS for safe charging, which may add about $5/cell, for a total of $2500, or $25/cell. I think it should be possible to design a 120 watt single cell charger for about the same cost, and it could be scaled down for a small 16 cell 48 VDC pack for about $400. A 120 watt 3.5volt charger will supply 34 amps or 300 A-h overnight. The same circuit could be scaled down to perhaps 15 watts (4 amps) for small packs as for electric bikes, for maybe $10/cell.
This would provide much greater economies of scale, where runs of 100 or 1000 boards would be feasible. Also, if any single board or cell should fail, it could be bypassed and the remaining cells will remain active with little effect on the overall performance. This is presently just a flash in the pan idea, but perhaps it has merit. Please let me know your opinions. Thanks!
Consider that a 12 kW charger, like the EMW unit I was working on, costs about $2000 and can handle something like 100 cells at 120 watts/cell, and also needs a BMS for safe charging, which may add about $5/cell, for a total of $2500, or $25/cell. I think it should be possible to design a 120 watt single cell charger for about the same cost, and it could be scaled down for a small 16 cell 48 VDC pack for about $400. A 120 watt 3.5volt charger will supply 34 amps or 300 A-h overnight. The same circuit could be scaled down to perhaps 15 watts (4 amps) for small packs as for electric bikes, for maybe $10/cell.
This would provide much greater economies of scale, where runs of 100 or 1000 boards would be feasible. Also, if any single board or cell should fail, it could be bypassed and the remaining cells will remain active with little effect on the overall performance. This is presently just a flash in the pan idea, but perhaps it has merit. Please let me know your opinions. Thanks!