Re- Speedo drive
Just get a GPS speedo - they are not expensive - and they look just like the real thing
Just get a GPS speedo - they are not expensive - and they look just like the real thing
Naw, I like the mechanicalness of the original gauges. And, I have electronics to feed signals to the other gauges, so, it would be a shame to skip the speedo.Just get a GPS speedo - they are not expensive - and they look just like the real thing
Coupler was fine at 100hz (though, that's 100hz to the OpenInverter algorithm, which, apparently might only be 33hz since mine's a 3 pole pair motor?). Still, that's half way there. No noticeable vibration. The tailshaft I have lower hopes for, but I'm going to try it out first. I'll probably throw a dial indicator on it at some point and see how bad the runout is. I'll need to do that anyways when I figure out how I'm going to be mounting the tailshaft housing to the motor.On the shaft - take it to a machine shop. Your Egyptian lathe setup is not going to cut it for concentricity and it'll vibrate itself to death from imbalance. Same goes for a coupler.
I kinda figured that, but then turning that coupler on the motor surprised the hell out of me with how well it turned out. I think it's just fine, but, I don't think I have a hope of the tail shaft being within an order of magnitude as precise.You'll be running the motor at around 4krpm, not the hundred or two where your methods might work.
I presume it's case hardened. Doesn't really matter to an abrasive wheel, it's not harder than aluminum oxide, sparks will fly just the same.I'd also do a hardness test on the shaft before anything. It may be case hardened.
Never crossed my mind. I'll bug some of my ME friends.Breaking the case hardening along the shaft may snap it at the discontinuity under load. I'll defer to the MEs here on that one.
Well, like the tail shaft, the coupler isn't going to be a safety issue (any more than losing power at speed would be). If it breaks, it breaks. It'll be enclosed in the tail housing and coupler housing.As far as DIY, you should DISCOURAGE people from skimping on the important stuff. People build their own engines all the time, but nobody does their own line bore or crank grinds. The coupler is one of the most critical mechanical parts of a build.
Likewise, I'm enjoying myself. I don't mind playing around and finding out what works and what doesn't. If everyone obeyed best practices, the solution would just be "Buy an EV".Your Flintstones build methods are, if anything, entertaining.
I totally underestimated the frustration and challenge of both bending and flaring brake lines. I don't regret getting steel lines in terms of bending, it was bad but manageable, but, flaring, yeah. Brake lines were one of the first things I bought, without really knowing anything at all. I even bought tube nuts without knowing there were different kinds of flares.If you are sensible and use the copper nickel brake lines just about any flaring tool can do a good job
About as much as the Martian Department of Transportation would in Canada.1.) How much homemade stuff will the USDOT let you "rig up" on the brake system of a passenger car?
- My braking pushrod coupler is an INCH thick. The OEM one it butts up against is less than half that, so less than 1/4 the cross sectional area. The bracket that holds the brake pedal on the CRV's iBooster in OEM configuration is not even 1/8" thick steel. It's fine. It's cosmetically crooked, but it's not a rotating shaft, it's a pushrod, aligned on center. It's ugly but irrelevant.2.) How much do you (or should you) trust all of those "rigged up" connections, on your braking system
If I was cutting corners, taking a factory 1/4" rod and saying "Oh, 1/8" thick is probably strong enough", then perhaps I'd be worried. But I'm not, I'm going in the other direction....& do you really think it's a good idea to put your life (& possibly others) on the line, by DIY'ing (rigging up) the brake system on your car?
Those flaring tools CAN do an adequate job on Copper Nickel brake lines - but even then its easy to screw up!About as much as the Martian Department of Transportation would in Canada.
No inspections in my neck of the woods.
Lots of people restoring classic cars are making their own brake lines. That's why they sell replacement brake line and brake flare tools in every auto parts store.
- My braking pushrod coupler is an INCH thick. The OEM one it butts up against is less than half that, so less than 1/4 the cross sectional area. The bracket that holds the brake pedal on the CRV's iBooster in OEM configuration is not even 1/8" thick steel. It's fine. It's cosmetically crooked, but it's not a rotating shaft, it's a pushrod, aligned on center. It's ugly but irrelevant.
- The brake line coupler I made is probably 300% as thick as brake line. The silver solder isn't mechanical, it's only a seal, and is sealed from both sides and maybe everything in between. The mechanical connection is about 3/4" of threaded connection, when the factory connection is like 1/4". I bet it's 1-2 orders of magnitude stronger than a flare fitting.
- My brake flares are the worst part of the system, and they're the thing I'm doing with the correct tools and methods.
So, how much should I trust them? I dunno, as much as anyone who's ever made a brake line or trusted some shop monkey to make them.
If I was cutting corners, taking a factory 1/4" rod and saying "Oh, 1/8" thick is probably strong enough", then perhaps I'd be worried. But I'm not, I'm going in the other direction.
IF there's a failure on the lines, it'll only fail front or rears, and I have 2 redundant breaking systems (regenerative and cable-actuated hand brake).
Really, the flares are the only thing I think is kinda shitty, and I'm obviously testing them.
You can fearmonger about anything... Do you really trust changing your tires yourself? What happens if your tire comes off on the highway and you lose control and kill someone, and the tire causes a bus full of kids to fall off a bridge?
Tool specifically says it's for soft steel brake lines.There is no way that I would TRY and use one of them on a steel brake line - THAT needs the proper (very expensive) hydraulic flaring tools
Yeah, that's the troubling thing, there's not a graceful way to test it.It's not going to be a problem until there's a problem.
It'd only affect rear brakes, which have regen and cable, and are only 10% of my stopping power anyways.It's the silver solder and the unknown corrosive effects of brake fluid on silver, for example, as are the high pressures I expressed concerns about earlier. I don't know of any construction, industrial, or farm equipment hydraulics that use solder as a threadseal. You're in uncharted territory here.
Well, that janky pushrod is how it's done OEM. Only my coupler is significantly thicker than the OEM one.I also am a bit concerned about the actuator - it won't be a problem unless the booster (or its power circuit/motor) fails and you drop from warp to impulse drive (unboosted emergency stop). Untested.
F'ckin' Duncan has repeatedly tried to convince me to not even have a brake booster, because it's unnecessary on a car this size.Duncan is the Mech Eng in this conversation, so he's the resident expert if there is one. I think you should listen to what Duncan has to say on this because of the DKe you have justifying what you did
Yes, of course. Single flare would be easy. It's the bubble portion that's a bit wonky.^^ needs a "double flare", not a single, to do it right.
I suspect my device is at least as heavy as your GT - and has a much much higher power output - and I use it on the track - and I'm just a wee bit older and weakerF'ckin' Duncan has repeatedly tried to convince me to not even have a brake booster, because it's unnecessary on a car this size.![]()