Mud on my face. Missed a few things.
EMW LM 211. Probably not hysteresis control. Ordinary PWM output to buck IGBT from Arduino via LM211 strobe input.
Comparator inputs seem to be overcurrent protection.
LLC. As I mentioned it might be good idea to use SiC in all cases. I can now say it's definitely a good idea. And a buck output stage is necessary. Only ordinary Si diodes in the LLC output bridge.
Although the DC gain is load indepedent at resonance, the Q factor is not. The extremely low reflected AC resistance sends the Q factor sky high (>2000). Making frequency setting close to resonance at high gain a major challenge.
The buck stage solves this issue (Q ~7 at max load). SiC doubles the range for frequency setting, since SiC has no high switching losses in the ZCS region below resonance.
EMW LM 211. Probably not hysteresis control. Ordinary PWM output to buck IGBT from Arduino via LM211 strobe input.
Comparator inputs seem to be overcurrent protection.
LLC. As I mentioned it might be good idea to use SiC in all cases. I can now say it's definitely a good idea. And a buck output stage is necessary. Only ordinary Si diodes in the LLC output bridge.
Although the DC gain is load indepedent at resonance, the Q factor is not. The extremely low reflected AC resistance sends the Q factor sky high (>2000). Making frequency setting close to resonance at high gain a major challenge.
The buck stage solves this issue (Q ~7 at max load). SiC doubles the range for frequency setting, since SiC has no high switching losses in the ZCS region below resonance.