DIY Electric Car Forums banner

Rate my build plan (c3 corvette)

23833 Views 80 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  MattsAwesomeStuff
5
Location: San francisco, CA

Budget: Like 15k for the donor car, and hopefully less than 20k for all the conversion parts and any labor costs.

Donor car: 1975 c3 corvette. They're cheap, easy to convert the bumpers back to the wonderful 68-72 chrome bumper design, and have some decent safety equipment upgrades over the early cars. A clean 1975 is like 15k, a clean 1970 is 25k or more, YIKES

also, maybe some race car flair to it, need big rear tires to hold all that torque eh?






Motor: Tesla model S P85 large rear drive unit OR Tesla model 3 performance rear drive unit. The entire tesla rear subframe and all the suspension components, fabricating mounts so it bolts onto the c3 ladder frame. This could be relatively easy or the hardest, most expensive part of the entire project. The motor 3 motor is more efficient when not under heavy load, and FAR FAR better cooling capacity BUT nobody supports their firmware yet and it isn't clear how many years it'll be until the T-1C supports it.




Battery: 34kw of chevy volt batteries. I'd like Gen2 but the Gen1s are half the price and only slightly lower capacity. Some in the engine bay with a battery enclosure to make it look like a V8 because yummy under hood candy, like ICON's derelict mercury EV did. the rest of the batteries go where the gas tank used to be, which may or may not hang lower and thus cause the full size spire tire sling to have to go away. Volt batteries have excellent high performance because of almost no voltage sag. They're also cheap, work very reliably, have a nice log-like form factor, and have built in excellent battery cooling. I'm hoping for 80+ miles of range




Cooling: unsure yet, but the water pump and electrically controller diverter valve out of a tesla. chevy volt batteries and the tesla motors have built in cooling systems so no need to screw around making chill plates.

Controller: EV Controls T-1C, pretty close to turn-key, i'd buy it from EV west specifically so i can lean on them for tech support and general info. This controller's already been used in a few tesla motor/chevy volt battery builds



Contactor: unsure

Power steering: I really want to keep hydraulic power steering, electric pump driven. It's wasteful but it feels so much better than electric power steering. EV West makes a belt fed pump but i'll probably re-use the one that came with the car.

A/C: MVP might omit this since i live in a SF and A/C is kinda unnecessary

Charger: Not sure how to get there, but i absolutely want to shoot for a 50kw charger which interfaces with CCS. With such a short range this feels like a heavy requirement for this to be driveable. There's some noises about CCS charging for DIY builds but this might be a wait and see, hopefully this becomes a mature thing soon (within a year). For 50kw, maybe just stack 5 of those 10kw tesla chargers...?

Safety: Haven't researched much but i would really like switchable fuses between every 72 volts or so, so at any given moment during assembly or maintenance, if i make an oopsie, i only get shocked with 72v before a fuse cuts it. Also, inertial fuses so in a crash, everything is isolated from everything else. Also, a first responder safety line, mimicking tesla's implementation with a BRIGHT RED WIRE right under the hood with a really obvious label on it.



Timeline: purchase the c3 within a few months, spend about a year maintaining it, adding quality of life upgrades, more deeply researching the platform, more deeply researching the feasibility of my componentry and fabrication. HOPEFULLY buy most of the drivetrain bits in advance and make sure the entire thing works on a bench, THEN start converting in fall of 2020 and be done some point before fall of 2021


So, what am i missing, what bad assumptions or assessments am i making, etc
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
21 - 40 of 81 Posts
If that's a factor i'd look at the packs used in the VW architectures, personally, because they're pretty good and will be EVERYWHERE soon
the two BIG problems with those are
1) unknown platform, like, haven't been used in a lot of conversions
2) ...
It isn't just unknown, it's multiple platforms. VW has talked about their "MEB" EV-specific platform for a long time, but every VW Group EV produced so far has been on an adapted engine-driven platform, and even the coming Porsche Taycan - which apparently has an EV-specific platform - is not on MEB. It's not at all clear to me that that the EV components will be consistent between those vehicles and what they will be building.
drivetrain wise, i'm going for the model S rear + 34kw volt batteries because it's been proving in multiple projects by now, i really like things that have been done before because it becomes a solved problem with fewer unknowns.
From an outsider's perspective... there are complicated parts of an EV build, and there are simple parts of an EV build. When you absorb it all at once, it all seems equally complicated. So I understand your "go with a known working solution" approach.

However, just so you can make an informed decision... Controllers and motors are agnostic about where the voltage comes from. So while you might be thinking "I want batteries I know will work with X", and intimidated from leaving this known pairing of motor and batteries, that's largely an unfounded fear.

Volt batteries are pretty high power density, but other than that, any battery system you choose would work fine with the Tesla motor. There's really no matching concerns at all. If you wanted to choose a different battery pack, everything will be fine and not additionally complicated. (Also, Tesla batteries for sure were designed for use with Tesla motors :p, if you want "proven" solutions then this is proven several orders of magnitude more ).

That means range isn't important, lower weight is a priority
So, that's a huge tradeoff right there.

If lower weight is a priority, then lose range.

If lower weight is a priority, then don't use Volt packs because they are very bulky and heavy for their energy capacity. You could get much lower weight for the same range (like, double) by switching to a different battery.

and being able to push tons of amps consistently is important. Volt packs sort of fall out naturally from those requirements.
Not really. Volt packs have awesome power capacity, but terrible energy capacity.

As for the tesla motor, i just find it'd be more livable vs the old school warp DC builds, also more aftermarket support both now and in the future.
Tesla motors are definitely more awesome than some old DC motor. Regen available, more power, etc. No argument there.

But I'm not sure what aftermarket support you're thinking should/could exist for a DC motor, to ever weigh into your decisions. I.E. What or why would you ever need for support? Change the bearings ever 15 years maybe? They'll be $10 each from any store, standardized for decades. Want it to go faster? Give it more voltage. They're as simple as soup.

I think this is another place your evenly-spread fear of "support" is misplaced.

There's a reason EV west is changing some of their kits over to a tesla small drive unit architecture instead of the siemens motors.
Cost is probably the reason. Marketing is probably another. People want stuff with Tesla parts in it. There will be enough crashed, pre-engineered Teslas to supply EV West for as much business as they'll ever have. Certainly more than some system they're patching together themselves in low quantities.

Model 3 motor would be better but...well....nobody is supporting that yet, and even if they supported it a year from now it'll be a while before it's proven.
Damien just got offered a Model 3 front and rear (they're different) motor on consignment basis that some of his community is trying to crowdfund to pay for. And a few other options. But you're correct. Volunteer open-source controllers are probably the most-abandoned and slowest-progressing facet of DIY EVs. Too highly specialized knowledge required, too huge of commitments to make.

And wiring up 37kw of tesla packs in order to get 350-400v nominal, that's a lot of S and not a lot of P, voltage saaaaaaag
I get where you're coming from, but, when you apples-to-apples it, I don't think that's how it works out. There's no free lunch.

Watts per pound or watts per KWh are going to be fairly comparable. You'll avoid voltage sag by increasing the size of the pack, sure, but keeping the pack size the same? Now it's just down to chemistry. Volt packs are from a hybrid so they're optimized to be a little more power heavy, but they're also old tech and twice the weight.

...

Anyway, it's your project, just trying to help make sure you're making the right choices for you for the right reasons.
See less See more
priority wise: Horsepower, handling, fast charging, and simplicity of components. That means range isn't important, lower weight is a priority, and being able to push tons of amps consistently is important. Volt packs sort of fall out naturally from those requirements.
Volt batteries are pretty high power density
...
Volt packs have awesome power capacity, but terrible energy capacity.
For a given voltage, "tons of amps" means "tons of power": this with "range isn't important" is a description of a need for high power, not high energy capacity.
For a given voltage, "tons of amps" means "tons of power": this with "range isn't important" is a description of a need for high power, not high energy capacity.
Right. But, is range that much of a non-issue?

Is the Volt actually the most power-dense option per pound?

Like, people rave about how they're power-dense per KWh (size of a pack), but, how much of that is just because it's actually pretty crappy in terms of KWh? Meaning you grab a pack of similar KWh, it compares favorably, but compare it to a pack of similar weight, it does not.

I haven't looked up the chart in a long time. I didn't think they were actually all that great.
i'll admit i'm going off just stuff i've read.
volt packs have great power density, bad energy density, are VERY inexpensive per kilowatt, well researched and known, and have cooling capacity baked into them instead of having to engineering chill plate placement
so if a want a simple(ish) install that can run 400 volts and have really good power density i'm kinda stuck

BUT! If there's some alternative out there which does most of the same stuff but has a better energy density i'm all for it, i just don't know what's out there that'll satisfy that.
Pacifica battery? maybe? I just don't know

for a split second i was thinking of using two of those model 3 long modules, one through the transmission tunnel and another cocked at an angle in the engine bay but....the two short(er) modules are only 72v each, 144v nominal :/

as you mentioned yeah, it's hard to get 400v out of half the packs out of some of these systems since the modules are all P and very little S
for a split second i was thinking of using two of those model 3 long modules, one through the transmission tunnel and another cocked at an angle in the engine bay but....the two short(er) modules are only 72v each, 144v nominal :/
I had the same thought, but those modules are almost 1/4 of the width of the Model 3 floor, so they would be too wide for a tunnel.

The Model 3 battery has three characteristics which are different from that of the typical modern EV:
  1. cylindrical cells (21 x 70 mm in this case), like all Teslas - this doesn't matter when working at the module level
  2. thermal management by fluid circulating in internal tubing, like the Model S/X - I see this as a good thing
  3. an abnormally small number of modules (two at 23S, two at 25S), meaning that each one is abnormally large and high-voltage - this makes no difference to the basic problem that half a pack is half-voltage, but gives less configuration flexibility
as you mentioned yeah, it's hard to get 400v out of half the packs out of some of these systems since the modules are all P and very little S
I would say that's the issue with all of current EV battery packs, not just some of them. If some production EV were using a much higher pack voltage then it would potentially be a source of modules that would total the desired 400 V or so in a smaller pack... but everything current is very similar, with most being 96S and the only a small variation around that.
See less See more
If that's a factor i'd look at the packs used in the VW architectures, personally, because they're pretty good and will be EVERYWHERE soon
IMO, we'll have fusion power plants well before VW produces anything, other than their stalling-oriented BS, in volume...
Great project, great platform!

By far your hardest task will be to replace the rear subframe. I know people do wild swaps all the time, but that is very unknown territory. It seems extraordinarily difficult to me. The success rate of a project seems to decrease precipitously with how long it takes to complete...I would aim for the simplest project that would produce a car you had a use for and wanted to drive.

If it were my project, I'd keep the transmission and use a different motor. The horsepower is in the batteries, and the torque you can get out of some of these motors is astounding. Yes, you'll still have to drag the gearbox around with a diff and rear axle, but it will make installation of the motor much simpler, and open up some flexibility with regard to battery voltage, motors, and gearing. You'll learn a lot, and have something to play with when you're on the road...and then you'll know for real what's lacking and what's not (and it might surprise you). You might even get the gumption to do another one "right" if you have a success to drive.

...All that said, an old Corvette with a Tesla rear would be really sweet. How do the track widths compare?

The Model 3 is by far the best-selling EV in the US at the moment, so those batteries won't stay expensive forever (though they'll never be cheap, as there are too many uses for good batteries once the price is right). Every time someone crashes a Tesla, an EV project gets its wings...
See less See more
IMO, we'll have fusion power plants well before VW produces anything, other than their stalling-oriented BS, in volume...
The meaning of "in volume" depends on the observer. So far from the VW group there have been at least the e-Golf and the Audi e-tron SUV.

The e-Golf is somewhere between a stick-some-batteries-in-it conversion like the Focus Electric and the EV-derived-from-existing platform like the Leaf. At least at one point it was the best-selling EV in Europe, at a couple thousand units a month. Is that "in volume"?

The Audi e-tron SUV is also a production vehicle, but expensive, just being released, and intended to be relatively low volume. It is derived from the MLB platform, but nearly unique, so it almost the from-the-ground-up EV that the world is supposedly waiting for. We'll know in a year if it sells in volume.

While there are many thousands of production VW EVs out there, I think it will be at least a couple more years before we have an idea of what the VW commodity components turn out to be.
The Model 3 is by far the best-selling EV in the US at the moment, so those batteries won't stay expensive forever...
The modules will still be awkwardly long, though...
You brought up handling as a concern. I too had that same concern and that's why I choose to NOT use the Tesla sub cradle. It's not a simple A arm design and I was having a hard time calculating the scrub radius/mounting height and camber. Just a word of caution. You might have already thought about those things.
You brought up handling as a concern. I too had that same concern and that's why I choose to NOT use the Tesla sub cradle. It's not a simple A arm design and I was having a hard time calculating the scrub radius/mounting height and camber. Just a word of caution. You might have already thought about those things.
i have not, i assumed it'd be good, and at the very least better than a leaf spring suspension setup designed in the late 50s

is the model 3's setup significantly better?
There's nothing wrong with the rear suspension design of the Tesla Model S/X, although the geometry is somewhat difficult to follow. It is essentially the same in design (although different in specific dimensions) as the "integral link" design used by Ford/Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, and others.

There's also nothing wrong with the leaf spring in the Corvette suspension (of any generation using them, which is C2 through C7 for the rear); it is just the spring, and not a control link, so it does not affect the geometry of the suspension at all. The C3 suspension is obsolete and undesirable, because it uses the axle shafts as control links and has horrible toe control.

I'm sure that the complete Tesla suspension would be a substantial upgrade compared to the C3's stock setup, but other designs might be easier to work with. If all you want of the C3 is the body, I'm pretty sure that there is at least one company which will sell you a completely new frame with C5/6/7 suspension front and rear (which is double A-arm at both ends), designed to fit a C3 body... but that chassis alone would consume your entire conversion budget.
See less See more
I'm sure that the complete Tesla suspension would be a substantial upgrade compared to the C3's stock setup, but other designs might be easier to work with. If all you want of the C3 is the body, I'm pretty sure that there is at least one company which will sell you a completely new frame with C5/6/7 suspension front and rear (which is double A-arm at both ends), designed to fit a C3 body... but that chassis alone would consume your entire conversion budget.

yyup,
http://roadstershop.com/product/full-chassis/1968-82-corvette-chassis/
https://www.streetshopinc.com/chassis-packages/1968-1982-c3-replacement-chassis.html
they're like 17 to 25k depending on options
if i was keeping the gas engine i'd do something like that.

there are various full coil conversion kits for the c3 which eliminate needing the diff case but those are also incredibly expensive.
https://www.ridetech.com/products/suspension-packages/product-3292/
if i'm going to drop 6 grand on something i'd rather it be fabricating subframe mounts, since even with this coilover system.....still need to fabricate mounts for the tesla motor.

also the problem with keeping the transmission/diff and using a DC motor in the engine bay is that'll take a lot of space that batteries could go in, and it keeps the sub-par rear suspension
there are various full coil conversion kits for the c3 which eliminate needing the diff case but those are also incredibly expensive.
https://www.ridetech.com/products/suspension-packages/product-3292/
if i'm going to drop 6 grand on something i'd rather it be fabricating subframe mounts, since even with this coilover system.....still need to fabricate mounts for the tesla motor.
... and they only fix the small irritation of the leaf spring mounting frame, leaving you with the problem of axle shafts as suspension members.
While it is a good modern setup the problem is lack of adjustability. They have the advantage of CAD and can model the suspension travel. So you will want to make sure you have the axle center at the same ride height as factory and build your mounting points from that location as the factory or you might find yourself with a camber problem and the factory setup doesn't allow for much adjustment.

See less See more
2
ah, that's what you were getting at, yikes, i had not considered that

another thing i hadn't considered, i think this detroit speed kit solves the axle shafts as suspension members problem
https://www.detroitspeed.com/1963-1...3-82-corvette-stock-differential-041740-group
....for $8,800 :eek:

Although this is making me lean a little more towards the model 3 setup, not sure if that has better adjustment though?

as for track width, there's this c3 image


and this for the model 3


the concern is, is the 3's track actually narrower? the problem with these images is..... it's measured rotor to rotor or wheel edge to wheel edge? the c3 image measures both separately which helps
hopefully this means the rotor-to-rotor of the 3 is 62, meaning i get a free 4 inches wider in the rear which is GOOD because i actually WANT to go for a widebody setup to keep this thing on the road!


gains:
-better cooling
-better efficiency
-better adjustment(?)
-more aftermarket support(?)
-better track aligntment
losses:
-not nearly as well understood so far, no turn key systems support it and there's some skepticism if they even will for a while
-possibly narrower track(?)
-slightly lower peak power. Scuttlebutt is that the 3's rear drive can do reliably 500hp with some software tweaking, but that monster p90 rear melon can smash out 600+
See less See more
although, counterpoint, adding aftermarket adjustment systems to the model s suspension isn't too bad
https://evtuning.com/products/adjustable-camber-bushings-for-tesla-model-s-and-x
Scuttlebutt is that the 3's rear drive can do reliably 500hp with some software tweaking, but that monster p90 rear melon can smash out 600+
...If the batteries can handle it. The 3's torque is limited by how much current the batteries can deliver at once. The P90 pulls something like 1500A.
I don't have access to a model 3 but your track image got me thinking. I not sure your going to be able to fit the unit between the frame rails. Not sure if you seen my build thread but I making a custom frame and using C7 suspension components. The Tesla unit was so wide I had to pocket the upper frame so I could use the C7 sub cradle. Anyway my point is the C7 is much wider than the C3.

So do you know what the distance is between the rails?

See less See more
21 - 40 of 81 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top