Michael Mohlere wrote:
> I realize that 62 mph is a problem for some commutes, however, I would
> be happier than a pig in "chocolate pudding" with same - that would
> cover 95% of my driving, and I'd have no problem puttering along at 62
> mph in the right hand lane if it meant that I never had to visit
> another gas station....I say "bring it"!! As previously noted by more
> than one post: a lot of talk, and no product (at any price). Even the
> wonderful tesla roadster hasn't seen production yet.....
>
>
>
> On 11/5/07, Cor van de Water <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 62 allows for Freeway driving, with some restrictions.
>>
>>
>> Cor van de Water
>> Systems Architect
>> Proxim Wireless Corporation http://www.proxim.com
>> Email: [email protected] Private: http://www.cvandewater.com
>> Skype: cor_van_de_water IM: [email protected]
>> Tel: +1 408 542 5225 VoIP: +31 20 3987567 FWD# 25925
>> Fax: +1 408 731 3675 eFAX: +31-87-784-1130
>> Second Life: www.secondlife.com/?u=3b42cb3f4ae249319edb487991c30acb
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven **
>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:41 PM
>> To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] article: Subaru doubles the battery range on itselectric car concept
>>
>> That's cool. But from what I found, the top speed is about 62 mph.
>> What good is 100+ mile range if you can't drive at freeway speeds? I don't know about you, but I definitely don't go more than about 10 miles on roads with a speed limit less than 70.
>>
>> -Steven
>>
>> On 11/3/07, Paul Wujek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Still just a concept, but it's getting better, 200km range on lithium:
>>>
>>> http://www.gizmag.com/go/8281/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Wujek ([email protected])
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For subscription options, see
>> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For subscription options, see
>> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Paul Wujek ([email protected])
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Peter VanDerWal <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm thinking that 62 mph doesn't sound like a number selected as a
> electronically governed limit, so it's probably a power limited speed.
>
> So it can probably only hit 62 on a long straight flat area, and probably
> takes a while to get there. Probably can't get reach 62 with any kind of
> hill.
>
>
> > I realize that 62 mph is a problem for some commutes, however, I would
> > be happier than a pig in "chocolate pudding" with same - that would
> > cover 95% of my driving, and I'd have no problem puttering along at 62
> > mph in the right hand lane if it meant that I never had to visit
> > another gas station....I say "bring it"!! As previously noted by more
> > than one post: a lot of talk, and no product (at any price). Even the
> > wonderful tesla roadster hasn't seen production yet.....
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/5/07, Cor van de Water <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 62 allows for Freeway driving, with some restrictions.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cor van de Water
> >> Systems Architect
> >> Proxim Wireless Corporation http://www.proxim.com
> >> Email: [email protected] Private: http://www.cvandewater.com
> >> Skype: cor_van_de_water IM: [email protected]
> >> Tel: +1 408 542 5225 VoIP: +31 20 3987567 FWD# 25925
> >> Fax: +1 408 731 3675 eFAX: +31-87-784-1130
> >> Second Life: www.secondlife.com/?u=3b42cb3f4ae249319edb487991c30acb
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >> Behalf Of Steven **
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:41 PM
> >> To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
> >> Subject: Re: [EVDL] article: Subaru doubles the battery range on
> >> itselectric car concept
> >>
> >> That's cool. But from what I found, the top speed is about 62 mph.
> >> What good is 100+ mile range if you can't drive at freeway speeds? I
> >> don't know about you, but I definitely don't go more than about 10 miles
> >> on roads with a speed limit less than 70.
> >>
> >> -Steven
> >>
> >> On 11/3/07, Paul Wujek <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Still just a concept, but it's getting better, 200km range on lithium:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.gizmag.com/go/8281/
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Paul Wujek ([email protected])
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For subscription options, see
> >> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For subscription options, see
> >> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mohlere
> > My EV: http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/296.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For subscription options, see
> > http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> >
>
>
> --
> If you send email to me, or the EVDL, that has > 4 lines of legalistic
> junk at the end; then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I
> wish with the message. By posting the message you agree that your long
> legalistic signature is void.
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
--
www.electric-lemon.com
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
> Michael Mohlere wrote:
>> I realize that 62 mph is a problem for some commutes, however, I would
>> be happier than a pig in "chocolate pudding" with same - that would
>> cover 95% of my driving, and I'd have no problem puttering along at 62
>> mph in the right hand lane if it meant that I never had to visit
>> another gas station....I say "bring it"!! As previously noted by more
>> than one post: a lot of talk, and no product (at any price). Even the
>> wonderful tesla roadster hasn't seen production yet.....
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/5/07, Cor van de Water <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> 62 allows for Freeway driving, with some restrictions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cor van de Water
>>> Systems Architect
>>> Proxim Wireless Corporation http://www.proxim.com
>>> Email: [email protected] Private: http://www.cvandewater.com
>>> Skype: cor_van_de_water IM: [email protected]
>>> Tel: +1 408 542 5225 VoIP: +31 20 3987567 FWD# 25925
>>> Fax: +1 408 731 3675 eFAX: +31-87-784-1130
>>> Second Life: www.secondlife.com/?u=3b42cb3f4ae249319edb487991c30acb
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>> Behalf Of Steven **
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:41 PM
>>> To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] article: Subaru doubles the battery range on
>>> itselectric car concept
>>>
>>> That's cool. But from what I found, the top speed is about 62 mph.
>>> What good is 100+ mile range if you can't drive at freeway speeds? I
>>> don't know about you, but I definitely don't go more than about 10
>>> miles on roads with a speed limit less than 70.
>>>
>>> -Steven
>>>
>>> On 11/3/07, Paul Wujek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Still just a concept, but it's getting better, 200km range on lithium:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.gizmag.com/go/8281/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Paul Wujek ([email protected])
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For subscription options, see
>>> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For subscription options, see
>>> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Paul Wujek ([email protected])
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
--
If you send email to me, or the EVDL, that has > 4 lines of legalistic
junk at the end; then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I
wish with the message. By posting the message you agree that your long
legalistic signature is void.
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
On 6 Nov 2007 at 18:37, Peter VanDerWal wrote:
> I'm thinking that 62 mph doesn't sound like a number selected as a
> electronically governed limit, so it's probably a power limited speed.
Sixty-two mph is 100km/h, isn't it?
David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Note: mail sent to "evpost" or "etpost" addresses will not
reach me. To send a private message, please obtain my
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Dominant <[email protected]> wrote:
> But it is 100kmh. Japan uses the Metric system, so limiting speed to
> a nice round figure like that makes sense, given that the maximum
> speed in Japan is 100kmh (and only then on divided national highways).
>
> At 11:37 AM 7/11/2007, you wrote:
> >I'm thinking that 62 mph doesn't sound like a number selected as a
> >electronically governed limit, so it's probably a power limited speed.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev