Morgan LaMoore wrote:
>> 1. Would this cooling effect also increase the power of a DC motor?
>
> I think so. Electric motors, both AC and DC, are mainly limited by
> heat. So if you can cool it better, you can run at higher power
> levels.
>
> That said, that cooling method might interfere with proper operation
> of the brushes, hindering commutation. If so, it obviously couldn't
> work on DC motors.
>
>> 2. Do AC motors offer greater performance? Reference this statement
>> in the paper, "based on the fact that AC drive technology offered the
>> highest performance to weight ratio and could be made cost effective
>> for electric vehicles"
>>
>> Thanks again in advance.
>
> Let's compare some numbers. The AC-150 motor weighs 50kg (including
> cooling) and has a rating of 50kW continuous. That's 1kW/kg, which is
> 0.608 hp/lb.
>
> ADC 6.7" = 16HP/85lbs=0.188 hp/lb
> ADC 9.1" = 28.5HP/150lbs=0.19hp/lb
> WarP 11" = 43HP/229lbs=0.188hp/lb (1 hour rating, not continuous)
>
> That's a clear win for AC induction. However, AC induction motors
> require more expensive/heavier electronics. We can factor that in,
> too:
>
> AC-150 electronics:
> 100A DC-DC, 20kW charger, motor controller: 66.1 lbs
>
> EV equivalent:
> DLS-45 45A DC-DC: 5.5 lbs
> PFC-50 12kW charger: 42 lbs
> Z1K-EHV controller: 29.5 lbs
> total: 77 lbs
>
> Oops! By using their 3-phase inverter as a charger and controller, the
> AC motor actually requires less electronics weight than the AC system!
>
> So the AC system is more efficient, has better power to weight, and
> has regen. The downside is that it costs $15,000.
>
> The only reasons to use DC over AC are cost and availability. Those
> are important reasons, though.
>
> -Morgan LaMoore
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Myles Twete wrote:
> Morgan LaMoore offered:
>
> Let's compare some numbers. The AC-150 motor weighs 50kg (including
> cooling) and has a rating of 50kW continuous. That's 1kW/kg, which is
> 0.608 hp/lb.
>
> ADC 6.7" = 16HP/85lbs=0.188 hp/lb
> ADC 9.1" = 28.5HP/150lbs=0.19hp/lb
> WarP 11" = 43HP/229lbs=0.188hp/lb (1 hour rating, not continuous)
>
> That's a clear win for AC induction.
>
But what are the peak powers for the different motors?
Generally, AC motors don't peak much higher than their continuous
rating, while DC can peak WAY higher than their continuous rating. This
usually means that a DC system can accelerate better than an equivalent
continuous power AC system.
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Morgan LaMoore wrote:
>> 1. Would this cooling effect also increase the power of a DC motor?
> I think so. Electric motors, both AC and DC, are mainly limited by
> heat. So if you can cool it better, you can run at higher power
> levels.
Exactly. Just as for ICEs, liquid cooling increases the power-to-weight
ratio. It's not AC vs. DC; it's that the AC motor example happens to be
liquid cooled, and all the DC examples were air-cooled.
--
Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget the perfect offering
There is a crack in everything
That's how the light gets in -- Leonard Cohen
--
Lee A. Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, leeahart_at_earthlink.net
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Kaido Kert wrote:
>The B&S Etek that you have on your page is actually cheaper in PMAC
>config, than in brushed.
>
>
yes and as it should be. both the etek's are reasonably priced. but pmac
requires a controller and the eteks are too small. make a 25kg version
of hte same and we would have something that will make the ICE guys
wonder where the motor is. they only see an alternator
as I said I'm still coming from the outside of motor theory but it looks
like permanent magnet motors has been overlooked in EVs
but maybe induction AC will be king
Dan
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Dan Frederiksen wrote:
> I still haven't looked into motor theory in details but seems to me that
> AC's main power advantage is rpm because it's free of brushes. but it's
> only speculation so far.
>
> another angle worth considering is some permanent magnet DC motors which
> seem to have much higher power density than the popular series motors.
> the Etek being an example. unfortunately that's a bit on the small size
> but at only 9kg it's quite impressive. Lemco has a very similar one but
> a bit larger so it could work in a car but unfortunately they were
> struck with rigor mortis in their brains when pricing it (around 1600$).
> performance wise it seems to be near the ADC 6.7" which is quite nice
> for 11kg (yes it's kilogram. it's time you learn proper units USA. if I
> convert it for you you wont learn anything)
> The ADC 6.7" L91 weighs 38.6kg
>
> I'm piecing together a table of motor specs for comparison:
> http://www.zev.dk/motor.htm (some values are guesstimations, some may
> be wrong, some may be factory lies or too conservative)
> (if you know some of the missing values or can correct some, let me know.)
>
> so far I haven't added any AC motors because it seems they are all
> ridiculously priced.
>
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev