current controller is Dana TM4 C0150, don't have schematic or can controls for it
Do you know which HVH250? -90 or -115 size? SOM (max 300 ARMS peak) or DOM (max 600 ARMS peak) winding? And what's the battery voltage (could be up to 700 V, but might be less than half that)? There could be quite a difference in what the controller has to handle, depending on the specific motor and installation.I have an HVH250 Remy motor...
It doesn't matter, but it seems a little strange that they used a controller from Dana TM4 who only sells controllers to enable potential customers to use TM4 motors... but used it with a BorgWarner (formerly Remy) motor.current controller is Dana TM4 C0150, don't have schematic or can controls for it
According to my calculations, the CO150 is the 320-450V version as the battery pack will max out at 421.2V.It doesn't matter, but it seems a little strange that they used a controller from Dana TM4 who only sells controllers to enable potential customers to use TM4 motors... but used it with a BorgWarner (formerly Remy) motor.
By the way, the name appears to be CO150 (with the letter "O"), rather than C0150 (with the digit "0")... it matters to online searching. It currently comes in regular (320-450 V input and max 615 ARMS output) and high-voltage (500-750 V input and max 425 ARMS output) versions, so it's not clear what the truck's battery voltage is likely to be.
It's a Vtrux.115 DOM traction motor
Do you think it will be easier to leave the ICE motor in it and simply extend the range of "plug in" capacity before the ICE kicks in?There's a press release with Dana bragging about the inverter being used in Vtrux.
No idea where you're going with all this, Brian...he's looking for a VCU to control the inverter that's already in the truck - the DANA.
If you have the space and weight capacity you can certainly do that, and keeping the ICE retains the hybrid capability, but I don't see how it makes anything simpler. Keeping enough of the controls to be functional on batteries would help, but does the presence of the engine really help?Do you think it will be easier to leave the ICE motor in it and simply extend the range of "plug in" capacity before the ICE kicks in?
3 main reasons to keep the ICE.If you have the space and weight capacity you can certainly do that, and keeping the ICE retains the hybrid capability, but I don't see how it makes anything simpler. Keeping enough of the controls to be functional on batteries would help, but does the presence of the engine really help?
I am not following but here is my line of reasoning.3 main reasons to ditch the ICE
1. Less work
2. More range
3. Your lack of knowledge to make a higher battery capacity hybrid work
😈
I am more familiar with putting lower voltage battery packs together up to 72V 20S configuration but never tackled putting together a battery pack of 400V though I have worked with 300V to 400V packs from other EVs and hybrids like the Chevy Volt and Prius. In one case, I took apart the Chevy Volt battery pack and used it as a part of my house (off grid) where I reconfigured the battery pack into a 14S configuration to get a 51.8V nominal (58.8V max) battery pack working in parallel with other size battery 14S battery packs that has been powering my house for 2 years charged by solar.Sounds simple in theory until you need to integrate that second BMS into the "motor controller" and ICE genset.