DIY Electric Car Forums banner

Azure Dynamics AC55

11K views 13 replies 6 participants last post by  JRP3  
#1 ·
urrently I'm focusing on the AzureDynamics AC55 motor, but there are some data which are puzzling me a bit.

Electroauto displays this motor for 78Kw peak at 8000 rpm's (34 cont.), while Azure Dynamics data sheets calls for only 59kw peak (25 cont.).

where is the truth?

Also, azure dynamics suggest this motor for direct drive applications as it is a low-speed design for a 3-5:1 ratio.

May I use it with a manual 5 gears transmission or is it better to remove everything?

any help?
thanks.
 
#2 ·
Maybe Azure Dynamics has de-rated the motor, since this sheet from Solectria claims 78KW http://www.scribd.com/doc/3917192/ac55
What vehicle are you going to use it in? If it's light enough you may be able to eliminate the transmission, but you'd probably want to talk to someone from electroauto about that.
 
#3 ·
it'd be for a Mercedes A-class.
probably an AC24 would be enough but our studies say a motor with at least 40kw continuois and 70-75kw peak would be perfect.

How can AzureDynamics have de-rated the motor??
How is it technicaly possible?
and why?
 
#7 ·
it'd be for a Mercedes A-class.
probably an AC24 would be enough but our studies say a motor with at least 40kw continuois and 70-75kw peak would be perfect.

How can AzureDynamics have de-rated the motor??
How is it technicaly possible?
and why?
Just in case you overlooked it, the AC55 is nearly 3 times the weight of the AC24 and double the voltage if you were hoping to design a 144V system.

I don't know why AzureDynamics would derate the motor, but it needs to be used with the DMOC controller, so maybe the controller is what is limiting the output?
 
#4 ·
Nothing physically changed about the motor, they may have just changed it's claimed output because the unit was being used in vehicles that were too large. This is just speculation on my part, but we have seen similar things happening with other products, such as Kelly controllers lowering the ratings on some of their controllers because people were operating them near the top of their capacity and having problems.